Fort Ben reuse marches on

April 21, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Lawrence Village at the FortThe Fort Harrison Reuse Authority is preparing to break ground on a massive infrastructure project that will lay the groundwork for the master-planned Lawrence Village at the Fort, the final phase of a decade-long redevelopment of Fort Benjamin Harrison. The $9-million project calls for new streets, landscaping, utilities, lighting, three parks, signage, rain gardens, raised median planters and entrance columns. Over 350 trees will be planted along streets featuring bike lanes, sidewalks and on-street parking. The roughly 90-acre Lawrence Village at the Fort calls for a new downtown with shops, offices and public plazas mixed among condos, townhouses and apartments. The area to be developed is bounded by Post and Lee roads and 59th and 56th streets. The group had originally hoped to start the work in August 2007. A groundbreaking now is scheduled for May 5. An earlier post is here.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • socrates#1fanApril 21, 2009 10:56 AM
    This area has some fantastic historic architecture.

    Will historic preservation be included in this?
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • caliboy28April 21, 2009 11:38 AM
    Historic preservation has been included in the redevelopment of Ft. Ben from day one.....
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • CoryWApril 21, 2009 12:35 PM
    I am very excited to see this get completed. Ft. Ben is a real assest to the area
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • LawrenceResidentApril 21, 2009 1:42 PM
    I hope Lawrence doesn't screw-up this project. This is a tremendous opportunity, but the community leadership isn't very good. Speaking of architecture, I can't stand the large business building on the south side of 56th St. that was built across from where most of this development is to take place. When viewed from the back side (which I get to see daily on my commute), the building's faux pinnacles look like stage props in the way they were constructed. Nevermind the new 24-hour waste exchange station that will probably be located just down the street from the area. I've lived in Lawrence for seven years and the housing market is the only thing keeping me there. The school system is a mess, they don't take care of their parks, and the water rates are still sky-high. The community is a pig wearing lipstick.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • CoryWApril 21, 2009 4:07 PM
    Well, I disagree about the community leadership. You have a great leader in charge of the Lawrence Community Dev. Corp...I just feel that the residents of Lawrence aren't getting the most from their elected officials.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • Erich R. H.April 21, 2009 7:41 PM
    On a very sad note our dear friend Elements is closing temporarily until financing is secured. :(
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • thundermuttApril 21, 2009 7:49 PM
    I agree with Cory about leadership in Lawrence: the City's director of redevelopment is also really great guy who makes things happen.

    And after what seems like years of petty political BS, they really seem to have their act together up there. There hasn't been one bad story about the Lawrence council or mayor lately.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • IvoApril 22, 2009 9:10 AM
    What's the hook? Why invest Lawrence? I want to this succeed as much as anybody (I REALLY DO!!) and maybe in twenty years it will. But again I ask why does a young family, young professional, retiree, want to move to Ft. Ben? Is it all a function of price? If so they better be dirt cheap when I can move myself/my family to Carmel and get better schools, lower taxes, lower crime, bigger better parks, proximity to employment corridors, better infastructure, on and on. I know the Carmel haters will blast the heck out of this but the metrics that citizens and developers alike use to choose where to invest speak for themselves!

    I sure will miss broad ripple when my fiance and I move. Hate to leave where I grew up but if you don't see why read the above again.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • Billy BaruleApril 22, 2009 9:45 AM
    Sorry Cory, leadership in Lawrence is a train-wreck. As a Center Twp resident, I probably shouldn't throw stones, but there is a subtle difference. You see, Lawrence leadership isn't so much corrupt as it is incompetent. No one hated Gomer Pyle, but then again, they didn't put him in charge of anything either. Not trying to be a hater, but if you are going to stick up for them, I have to call you out.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • CoryWApril 23, 2009 10:49 AM
    I am discussing the Lawrence Commeunity Dev Corp, not the elected officials. The elected officials in Lawrence leave something to be desired, but have a lot of faith in my very good friend that leads the CDC.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • WYA!April 24, 2009 9:25 AM
    This is our neighborhood and we're excited about it. Things had been at such a standstill for awhile we didn't know if they were still moving forward with it.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • CrossedwiresApril 25, 2009 9:23 PM
    The CDC director is riding coat tails, just like she did at the state and city.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • MDBApril 27, 2009 1:10 PM
    Wilson's right. I worked on several projects in Ft. Ben and the problem with the Reuse Authority goes back nearly a decade (if not more). A lot of schlock was built in the early 2000s and the developers, one in particular with close ties to our MDC, ignored the Smart Growth/New Urbanism principles that everyone else was exploring at the time.

    And just count the newer buildings that have exterior finishes that terminate on outside corners, just like low-end tract housing with brick on the front of the garage only. It's pretty sad to see the opportunities that were missed. The result is a mish-mash of 1980s-style development and design hampered by questionable construction quality.

    Yet I'm hopeful that the area can still be turned around with the new direction of the last few years. It's a beautiful area.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT