IBJNews

Fortune Industries reports higher profit, lower revenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Fortune Industries Inc., a publicly traded professional employer organization, on Tuesday reported fiscal-year profit of $828,000, an 85-percent increase from fiscal 2009.

For the fiscal year ending June 30, the increase in profit translated to 6 cents per share, up from 3 cents per share the previous fiscal year.

The company attributed the increased profits to reduced losses on the company’s health care plan, continued efficiencies and lower operating expenses.

Revenue for the fiscal year fell 20 percent from the previous year, to $60.7 million.

The decrease resulted mostly from the sale of non-PEO subsidiaries in the prior fiscal year. The subsidiaries contributed revenue of $19.4 million in the 10-month period ending June 30, 2009.

Profit and revenue reported in fiscal 2009 reflected a shorter 10-month period. Company directors in April 2009 changed the company’s fiscal year-end from Aug. 31 to June 30.

“The previous year has been among the most difficult in our nation’s economy in recent history,” Fortune President and CEO Tena Mayberry said in a prepared statement. “We look forward to future increased earnings as the recession slowly fades and unemployment decreases.”

Mayberry replaced John Fisbeck as CEO in January.

PEOs handle payroll, payroll taxes, Worker’s Compensation claims, health plans, and other employee benefits for employers. Fortune provides human resource consulting and management, employee-assessment, training and benefits-administration services to small- and medium-sized businesses in 49 states.

Fortune shares closed Tuesday at 26 cents each, down from a high of $1.25 almost a year ago.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Duh
    Did you not read the entire article?

    "PEOs handle payroll, payroll taxes, Workerâ??s Compensation claims, health plans, and other employee benefits for employers. Fortune provides human resource consulting and management, employee-assessment, training and benefits-administration services to small- and medium-sized businesses in 49 states."
  • Owner www.hroplus.com
    I am not familiar with Fortune Industries. What is their market expertise and geographic experience?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

    2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

    3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    4. If you only knew....

    5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    ADVERTISEMENT