IBJNews

General Growth backs new Brookfield plan over Simon offer, source says

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

General Growth Properties Inc. plans to back a revised bankruptcy exit plan proposed by Brookfield Asset Management Inc. over a competing offer by Simon Property Group Inc., said a person with knowledge of the decision.

Brookfield and its partners, Fairholme Capital Management LLC and Pershing Square Capital Management LP, proposed changing their bid to receive fewer stock warrants once the deal is approved by the bankruptcy court, said the person, who asked not to be named because the talks are private. That would make it less expensive for another bidder such as Simon to make a new offer for the company.

Brookfield and Simon, the largest U.S. shopping mall owner, have been competing since February, after General Growth turned down a $10 billion takeover offer from Simon. It instead backed an investment plan led by Brookfield that would keep the company independent. Simon last month countered with a proposal that matches Brookfield’s terms while omitting a provision that would require General Growth to issue stock warrants.

A bankruptcy court hearing on General Growth’s auction process is scheduled for May 5. The hearing was pushed back from last week while Chicago-based General Growth, the No. 2 U.S. mall owner, considered the competing proposals.

Under the revised plan, Brookfield and its partners would get 40 percent of the 120 million warrants they’re seeking once their proposal receives court approval. They would receive 20 percent more after 60 days, and the remainder over the course of a year, vesting daily, according to the person. Staggering the warrants would reduce the extra price Simon would have to pay should it make another offer for the company.

David Keating, a General Growth spokesman, said he had no immediate comment. Les Morris, a spokesman for Indianapolis-based Simon, also said he had no comment. Katherine Vyse, a spokeswoman for Brookfield in Toronto, didn’t immediately return a telephone call seeking comment.

Simon estimates the 120 million warrants could cost General Growth shareholders $895 million, while General Growth has put their value at about $519 million. Simon CEO David Simon said last week that the warrants would make General Growth “too expensive” to purchase.

“To the extent that the Brookfield plan gets done, and the warrants get implemented, we will not participate in the auction that the company is going to ultimately run in bankruptcy,” Simon said in an April 27 interview.

Under the revised plan, Brookfield and Pershing Square also are committing to a $500 million increase in their equity investment, should it be needed, said the person familiar with the plan. The Brookfield-led group also would provide a $1.5 billion debt commitment if it’s needed, the person said.

Brookfield and its partners also have their warrants replaced, once the deal is completed, with ones to buy shares of a newly formed General Growth Properties at $10.50 each, the person said. Under the previous plan, the price was $10 each.

General Growth filed the largest real estate bankruptcy in U.S. history in April 2009 after amassing $27 billion in debt making acquisitions. Its properties include New York’s South Street Seaport, Boston’s Faneuil Hall and the Grand Canal Shoppes and Fashion Show in Las Vegas.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT