GM's looming bankruptcy

May 29, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
So, three decades of decline has come to this for General Motors: a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition expected to be filed Monday.

Lots of problems contributed to its downfall, but now the carmaker faces an extremely steep climb.

The bankruptcy will winnow its model line to vehicles consumers like best, but that doesnâ??t mean consumers will buy the cars. The brands might be suffering from fatal damage, particularly in such influential markets as California and much of the East Coast.

Do you believe GM will make it? Or is bankruptcy the next-to-last nail in its coffin?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • I think they will make it. They make a very good car, just to many makes and models. It should be Cadillac, Chevy, and Saturn and that should be all of the makes. Each line should feature about 5-7 models. Cadillac should lose the SUVS and focus on cars. Saturn could be the economy line with Chevy having a economy model as well. Trucks and SUVS should be under the Chevy brand. This is my non-expert opinon however. By the way, if GM is looking to move from Detroit, Indy should try to lure them downtown. The unions here are very weak. Probably a plus for them.
  • I don't believe GM or Chrysler will make it over the long term. I think the way the bankruptcies are being handled by the Federal Government will alienate a large percentage of future car buyers and their future sales will decline even more.
  • Know how many car companies were around when the Big 3 formed? 90 years ago there were close to 1000 car companies.
    Take the money we're using to bail and set up a fund for emerging companies with technologies that help with performance, mileage etc.

    GM and Chrysler won't and shouldn't keep going, they pooped in their own nest a long time ago with bloated managment and arrogance.
    It's going to be painful and tough but after the internet bubble burst we've seen wonders and breakthroughs we couldn't imagine.
  • I'm with Kris. For one thing, many of the smaller suppliers who worked with GM and Chrysler are currently and will continue to be closing due to the lack of business. Needless to say, the lack of material can only serve to drive up prices.

    This in turn, will have a negative effect on Ford, who like Chrysler and GM is saddled with union issues, pension issues, etc..

    I think what we will see is a long-term flight to similarly priced, but higher quality, foreign autos.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. "And the success of the Indiana GOP to not allow an expansion of Medicaid had nothing to do with Indiana hospitals' financial woes? Fixed that for you; editorial bias rebalanced. Seriously, there are so many things wrong with Obamacare that the only way one can view it as a success is to assume that it was designed to fail our way into a government single payor healthcare system. The system is complex, creates huge regulatory burdens and overhead and yet still does not have adequate means to control escalating health care costs. But then when you elect a 10th grade math drop out with no quantitative reasoning skills to be President of one of the world's most important economies in troubled times, you can't really be surprised by blatant stupidity.

  2. No NIMBYs here to chase off a decent development. We don't need tons of parking and we'd happily play the role of host to a downtown Whole Foods.

  3. Whatever you do, don't change a single thing about Broad Ripple. I want it to look just like it did in the late '70s, with 30% of the north side of Broad Ripple Avenue burned out and plenty of places to park. That's right Broad Ripple, NEVER CHANGE. Let the world pass you by, don't improve your empty, abandoned lots full of weeds. Someday someone will want to film a zombie movie here.

  4. Hollywood could step in and make a movie about the history about this forlorn series. It could be a full celebrity cast of characters. WOW. http://www.advanceindiana.blogspot.com/2013/02/indiana-taxpayers-forced-to-pay-for.html

  5. This shouldn't come as a shock to many. Austin is a great city, and Indy needs to take some notes. Austin invests in decent transit options, has a highly educated workforce, embraces a creative class, and --despite being the state capital-- is not micromanaged by rural and suburban legislators. Want Indy to grow? Invest in the city (i.e. spend money). Raise taxes a bit, and use the money to improve education. And keep the state legislature out of Indy the other 9 months of the year.

ADVERTISEMENT