Patrick, Fisher get sponsor support

May 8, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
gdaddylogoThe Indianapolis 500 should get a boost from a marketing blitz that plans to launch this month.

For the second straight year,, an Arizona-based Internet domain name registry, will be the presenting sponsor for the Indianapolis 500 television broadcast on ABC. As part of the deal, will have its iconic branding on everything from broadcast segments to aerial and in-car views.

GoDaddy will also do some separate marketing promoting its affiliation with the race and Andretti Green Racing driver Danica Patrick. GoDaddy founder Bob Parsons, who made a name for himself with his company’s racy Super Bowl ads, said GoDaddy’s presence at this year’s Indianapolis 500 will be bigger than ever.

Parsons said his decision to sponsor the broadcast was an easy one. “When you think of IndyCar racing, the first race that comes to mind is the Indianapolis 500,” Parsons said.  “They don’t call it the Greatest Spectacle in Racing for nothing.”

Patrick, 26, raised eyebrows in 2006 when she signed on to become a primary spokeswoman for GoDaddy, known for parading scantly clad women around in their television ads. Patrick said she's proud to be partnered with a company as committed to racing as GoDaddy.

Meanwhile, Sarah Fisher Racing today announced that Wisconsin-based Direct Supply Inc., a national supplier of equipment and e-commerce solutions to long-term healthcare communities, will sponsor Fisher in the upcoming Indianapolis 500.

Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed, but motorsports business experts estimated it at mid to high five-figures.

Direct Supply, which returns as a sponsor at the Indianapolis 500 for the third time, is new to SFR and Fisher, 27, of Commercial Point, Ohio.

The announcement comes the day after SFR officials said they lost their primary sponsor due to that company’s failure to meet a May 1 payment deadline.
  • Good deal for Sarah Fisher securing sponsorship for the Indy 500.
  • Now that ResQ is gone, I wonder what Sarah is going to do with that fancy race suit. It really is a shame. With all the subsidies TG has floated over the years, you'd think he'd have interest in making sure Sarah gets in the show. I know, TG provides no entitlements. Although it seems Danica has gotten her fair share of entitlements over the years-from various sources.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.