GOP-led panel tweaks Daniels' school voucher bill

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Fewer families would qualify for private school vouchers under changes Republican lawmakers have made to Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels' controversial proposal.

The voucher program would use taxpayer money to help parents send their children to private schools. The Republican-led House Education Committee amended the bill Tuesday to tighten income guidelines for the "school choice scholarships" and to specify that participating private schools must fall under state accountability rules.

So many people wanted to testify at the legislative hearing that committee chairman Rep. Robert Behning, R-Indianapolis, said after four hours that the panel would break for the day. He later announced that the committee would reconvene Wednesday morning to consider the bill, and lawmakers could vote on the proposal then.

Critics said vouchers drain money from public schools, which accept all students, and send it to private schools that can pick and choose who is admitted.

"It's only going to worsen the two-tiered system of public and non-public schools," said Dena Rae Hancock, a mother of seven from Indianapolis. "Separate but equal is inherently unequal."

Advocates said vouchers would give low- and middle-income families the same education options as wealthier families, who can choose to move to a school district they like or pay private school tuition.

"This is about choices," said state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett, who attended Catholic schools while growing up and decided to send his own children to public schools. "I believe parents should be able to choose either side."

Rep. Shelli VanDenburgh, D-Crown Point, told Bennett that by supporting the voucher proposal, he was essentially saying that public schools cannot be fixed and that kids need another option.

"You're saying that you cannot turn schools around," she said. "It's sending a negative message about the job you're doing."

Bennett said low-income students simply deserve the same options other families have.

"This is not a condemnation of our public school system," Bennett said.

Helen Day, a nurse and mother of six from Indianapolis, said she wanted the option of sending her children to private schools. A scholarship from a not-for-profit group helped her send her older children to attend private school in Indianapolis, but now they are in college and she can no longer afford to send her younger children to private school.

"My family has seen the benefits that school choice has to offer," she said. "I am not happy with the education that my younger daughter is currently receiving."

VanDenburgh questioned whether the public school in Day's district is academically failing. Day's older children attended Cardinal Ritter High School, where 77 percent of students passed math and English statewide tests last year. Without the scholarship, she said, they would have attended Pike High School, where just 45 percent passed both exams.

"Educationally, they were better off," Day said. "It's a parent's choice."

VanDenburgh said private schools play by different rules than public schools. Public schools can't force parents to be involved with their students' education, for example.

"Their hands are tied," she said.

The bill as originally proposed included a sliding scale that would have given vouchers to wealthier families. A family of four earning more than $100,000 a year would have qualified for a scholarship under that plan.

But lawmakers said they wanted to focus on more low- and middle-income families. The revised bill limits scholarships to families earning no more than twice the income limits for the federal reduced lunch program, or about $81,000 a year for a family of four.

Under the amended proposal:

— Only children currently attending public schools would be eligible for vouchers.

— Families that qualify for the reduced lunch program — those earning about $40,000 for a family of four — would be eligible for vouchers worth up to 90 percent of the per-student funding their current public school district receives. That amount varies by district, but the statewide average is about $5,500. That means those families would get vouchers worth up to about $4,950.

— Families earning up to twice that amount would qualify for vouchers up to 50 percent of their district's per-pupil funding. Using the statewide average, those vouchers would be worth about $2,750.

— The maximum voucher amount for students in grade kindergarten through 8th grade would be $4,500.

— Private schools participating in the program would have to take statewide ISTEP exams as public schools do and would fall under state academic accountability laws.

— Because the scholarship amounts are only a percentage of public school per-student funding, the state could save money from the program. Any savings would be redistributed to public schools statewide.


  • this bill is constitutional
    Sometimes I think, "Wow I should have waited to go to college until Obama took office so I could get more money to put me through college. Now the entire bill is on me...where's the retro-support."

    Same with these students already in private school. The families found a way to make it work. Others didn't. And now those others get the free support.

    That's the way it works. Sometimes you bust your butt to get into something earlier than others and you miss later benefits or free support. For example, if you bought stock when shares were $50 and now you could buy them for $30, you don't ask them to cut you a check for the difference just because you bought them too early and had to pay more. It's the chance you take to get in early to get the return sooner versus waiting for someone else to pay your way through.
  • apples to apples please
    RICH: Tell me how many special ed and English as a second language students HSE has compared to IPS and Gary. Also, how many physical facilities does HSE have to maintain compared to these other districts (e.g. buses, buildings). When you consider those numbers, then the comparison is fair. I am sick and tired of hearing suburban and rural schools citing the per capita funding difference in a vacuum.
  • Unintended Consequence
    Watch for tidal wave of otherwise-eligible students in private schools back to public solely so they can be "in public schools" when the vouchers first become available.
  • Will Work
    Obviously it will work because if someone poor is currently attending private school, then they obviously can afford it. Also look at the descrepancy of per pupil funding between schools...it's not even close to equal. IPS, Gary, even Lafayette get almost twice per pupil what an HSE student gets and all the "poor" residents of Marion county could care less about that inequality.
    • Won't Work
      I'm 100% for vouchers. However, the bill would only let those poor people currently in public schools use them while people who are equally poor and who have already removed their children to private schools won't qualify for the vouchers. Has any of the sponsors of the bill bothered to talk to a lawyer about whether you can treat poor people unequally like that? Trust me, you can't. That part of the law is unconstitutional.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

    Subscribe to IBJ