Harry Potter in the buff

April 10, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Much is being made of the fact that actor Daniel Radcliffe (you know him as Harry Potter) will be appearing nude in the upcoming Broadway production of “Equus,” recreating the role he played to acclaim and box office success in London.

It’s difficult not to admire Radcliffe’s willingness to stretch — and expose himself — in this challenging part. (For those unfamiliar, “Equus” concerns the crisis of faith of a psychiatrist trying to determine why a troubled young man blinded six horses with a steel spike.)

In the original 1970s Broadway run of the show, a succession of big name actors — Anthony Hopkins, Richard Burton, Anthony Perkins, Leonard Nimoy — played the doc, while his patient was played by unknowns. As such, there was less attention to the full monty written into the play.

On paper, this seems like a self-defeating idea for Radcliffe. How will it be possible not to think about the actor instead of the character when he’s out there in the altogether? Surely the experience of seeing a well-known actor in the part will be very different than seeing a relatively anonymous one (such as the “Equus” original Peter Firth).

So do you suspect most of the audience at “Equus” will be there for entirely the wrong reasons?

When does nudity work on stage? When doesn’t it? 

Those who frequent the Phoenix Theatre or Theatre on the Square have seen their share of (mostly male) bare bodies, so feel free to chime in with your thoughts.
  • I think Radcliffe is stretching his dramatic chops by performing this role in Equus! Has anyone seen this drama? It is an AMAZINGLY DRAMATIC role that any young actor (willing to show his all) would dream of playing. I do, however, think that many audience members will attend the production mainly to see him in the buff. Producers aren't stupid. ;oD
  • We saw his performance on stage in London and it was superb; never thought about Harry Potter at all
  • If Radcliffe being in the cast is getting this wonderful play revived on Broadway, great! I just hope that people who go to see it for him are going to see him stretch as an actor -- not to see his privates.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1