IBJOpinion

HETRICK: You can’t achieve velocity with one foot on the brake

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Bruce Hetrick

“I don’t know why you don’t take me downtown,

like you got anywhere better to be.”

Lady Antebellum, “Downtown”



Last week, Indianapolis Downtown Inc. rolled out its vision for the future. Called “Velocity,” the 60-page plan was billed in one news account as a “multiyear effort to strengthen neighborhoods, improve amenities and attract new businesses and residents.”

As a former marketing/PR director for IDI, a former downtown resident and business owner, and current downtown worker bee, I want to be first on my feet shouting, “Bravo!”

But a funny thing happened on the way to my standing O.

You see, sometime in the past few days, weeks or months, a slew of somebodies got shot or stabbed or otherwise offed in Indianapolis. And the rash of dead bodies made news around the nation.

So my son Zach, who grew up in downtown Indianapolis, Forest Hills, Fishers and suburban Fort Wayne—and who now lives in New York City—sent me a telling text.

“Your city requires Kevlar to walk around in now. Who would have guessed that Brooklyn is safer?” Zach said.

Ouch.

Crime isn’t the only thing that doesn’t pay in Indianapolis.

For years, I stood in my former downtown and Forest Hills neighborhoods, chatting with young couples who had tykes and toddlers. Time and again, they expressed anxiety over when (rarely “if”) they’d have to leave the neighborhood as the young ones approached school age. Eventually, I saw moving vans pack them up and move them out.

Empty-nesters we seemed able to keep. With a few brave exceptions, families with children eventually coveted Carmel or Zionsville or some other suburb or exurb with exemplary educational options.

Then, there’s misguided social meddling, such as the effort to ban gay marriage and domestic partnerships in the state’s constitution. Such measures threaten to dissuade the very millennial generation that IDI’s business and residential push aims to attract.

Thus, while we’re striving to push one pedal to the metal in the interest of “velocity,” the other is on a brake called crime, education and discrimination.

Former Indianapolis Mayor Bill Hudnut, whose vision, determination and public/private partnerships set the stage for modern-day downtown Indianapolis, once said, “You can’t be a suburb of nothing.”

Amen.

But the converse is also true. You can’t be the cream-puff center of a rotten egg.

Much has been made in recent weeks of a Livability.com “top-10 list” ranking downtown Indianapolis as the best downtown in America.

Nice publicity. But here’s the rub.

When I went to the Livability.com website to learn more, I also found a list of the 100 best places to live in the United States.

In a ranking based on economics, health care, housing, social/civic capital (read: crime, voter participation, partaking in community activities), education, amenities, demographics and infrastructure, Indianapolis didn’t make the list at all. In fact, no Indiana community made the list. Not one.

If our state and its communities are not regarded for livability, how can the island known as downtown Indianapolis thrive, and, if it doesn’t, how can downtown lift the rest of the city and state all by its lonesome?

On the IDI website, Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard says, “All neighborhoods are important, but when it comes to driving the economy of our surrounding region and this great state, and funding programs and resources for all neighborhoods, keeping Downtown Indianapolis healthy is imperative.”

This notion is reinforced by an Indiana University Public Policy Institute study showing downtown Indianapolis’ impact on jobs, tax revenue and the economy statewide.

But while downtown matters, and while the bells and whistles of Velocity— stronger neighborhoods, public rest rooms, better street lighting, improved transit, more parks, free wi-fi, a pedestrian bridge to IUPUI, additional bikeways, et al.—are appealing, any additional investments in downtown must be complemented by regional action and increased investment in all that surrounds downtown, especially education, crime prevention and welcoming (not discriminatory) social policies.

Twenty years ago, when I worked for IDI, our biggest struggle was getting people over their mental hurdle about driving “all the way downtown” (a phrase I came to despise in a place where that trip takes 20 minutes).

Now, if all the ballyhoo is accurate, people want not only to visit downtown, but also to live there.

But just as trickle-down economics was a bust at boosting jobs and incomes nationwide, expecting downtown Indianapolis to lift everything around it is naïve.

If current and potential downtown residents fear they’ll be shot, or that their children can’t get a decent education, or that the community and state are less than livable and welcoming, they’ll move on and move out.

In short, we can no longer invest solely from the inside out.•

__________

Hetrick is a writer, public relations consultant and visiting professor of public relations for the IU School of Journalism at IUPUI. His column appears twice a month. He can be reached at bhetrick@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • I call bologna...
    I challenge the notion of downtown being littered with violent crime. I fully acknowledge that a lot of property crime happens, particularly around Circle Center. But the shootings and stabbings rarely, if ever, occur downtown. I'm not saying there isn't a crime problem, both downtown and in the inner ring suburbs. But equating the Mile Square with 38th Street is lunacy.
  • My downtown business has been broken into thrice
    And, IMHO, a lot of it has to do with rather suspect Indianapolis city planning decisions just north of the mile square. We have also offices in other cities (much larger ones). Doing a bit of research, I was shocked to find Indy's crime rate, both generally and by specific zip code, to be higher than in either of our other mega-city locations.
  • Moved Away
    I lived in Downtown Indianapolis for almost a decade, and had a lot of fun living there. Many great things abound about the experience there, but I can't say that I miss it at all. From a location many days' drive away, I can now say that moving away from there has been one of the best decisions I ever made. Politically, the place is an absolute mess. The environment is for sale for profit. The only answer to failing schools has been to privatize them, alter their test scores, and cut taxes again and again so that everything looks just fine on paper. I don't think that there's anything that cold lure me back.
  • Circle center mall
    Note that circle center has become a magnet for crime. Why go downtown where the police cannot control the crime. It used to be safe to go downtown 10 years ago, but now that downtown is less than the north side it is.a place to work and leave after 5. Perhaps IPD should be replaced by a private police force. They can't seem to protect people in the mile square.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT