IBJNews

Historic Landmarks to announce move, name change

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana is expected to announce Tuesday that it will move its headquarters to the Old Centrum, a striking Romanesque Revival church at 12th Street and Central Avenue in Indianapolis.

Work on the church, formerly Central Avenue United Methodist, has already begun. As IBJ reported in February, the foundation acquired the building from its former owner to stabilize it after a period of disrepair. Foundation President Marsh Davis said at the time that his organization was considering moving its 22-member Indianapolis staff from its offices on the Central Canal to the Old Centrum.

The landmarks foundation, however, won’t likely take up the entire 80,000-square-foot building. One of the main interior features of the church, which opened in 1892, is an auditorium praised for its acoustics.

Full restoration could cost $10 million, according to an estimate by the building’s previous owner, the Old Centrum Foundation.

Historic Landmarks Foundation said in a press release that it will also announce on Tuesday a major donation that would preserve the building. Bill Cook, the medical equipment magnate from Bloomington who put up the money to restore the historic West Baden Springs Hotel in southern Indiana, will attend the Tuesday morning press conference.

Also on Tuesday, Historic Landmarks Foundation said it will unveil a new name. The change is expected to help distinguish the statewide organization from other historical groups.

Founded in 1960, Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana is the largest private statewide preservation group in the United States. It has nine regional offices in addition to its Indianapolis headquarters.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Strange Decision
    Seems like a strange decision to move out of their current canal headquarters, which they already own. I think they lost a tenant in that building when the north end was damaged in the Cosmo fire, so maybe they're looking to vacate the whole building and put it on the market?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT