Homebuilders see second straight drop in permit filings

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The central Indiana home-construction industry experienced its second straight month of declining permit filings in November, following a streak of 15 straight months of year-over-year increases.

Homebuilders filed a total of 317 single-family building permits in the nine-county metro area in November, a 2-percent drop over the same month a year ago, the Builders Association of Greater Indianapolis reported Tuesday. Permit filings were down 5 percent in October on a year-over-year basis.

Despite the monthly decline, BAGI said year-to-date numbers are up 18 percent over 2012. A total of 4,625 permits have been filed so far in 2013, up from 3,907 during the first 11 months of 2012.

This year's number has already exceeded 2012's full-year total of 4,182, which means the area will have its second straight year of homebuilding growth.

Hamilton County was the busiest county for homebuilding in November, with 135 permits filed, down 1 percent from a year ago.

Permits filings rose from 45 to 51 in Marion County, a 13-percent increase.

Hendricks County saw a 16-percent decline in filings, from 45 to 38. Permits rose 65 in Boone County, from 20 to 33.

Recent activity in central Indiana remain slow compared with pre-recession numbers. More than 930 permits were filed in the area in November 2005.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. "This was a very localized, Indiana issue," he said. As in, Indiana failed to expand Medicaid to cover its poor citizens resulting in the loss of essential medical services, including this EMS company. Well done, Indiana GOP. Here are the real death panels: GOP state governments who refuse to expand Medicaid for political reasons.

  2. In the "one for all, all for none" socialist doctrine the sick die...this plus obama"care" equates to caucasian genocide plus pushed flight to cities thus further eroding the conservative base and the continualed spiral toward complete liberal/progressive/marxist America.

  3. There is a simple reason why WISH is not reporting on this story. LIN has others stations in different markets that are affiliated with CBS. Reporting about CBS blindsiding WISH/LIN due to CBS's greed and bullying tatics would risk any future negoations LIN will have with CBS in other markets.

  4. My best always! Dave Wilson

  5. How did Columbus, Ohio pull off a car share service without a single dollar of public subsidies? They must not have a mayor who is on the take like Indianapolis. Daimler Benz offers Columbus residents their Smart Cars on a market-driven basis: "This has some neat features. Cars don’t have to be picked up and dropped off at fixed points. You find one with your smart phone based on GPS, and drop it off anywhere in the service area you can find a spot – even at a meter. These cars aren’t required to feed the meter so you get free on street parking while using them. I was told this system was put in place on a market basis without subsidies – and that the vendor actually pays the city for the use of the meters." http://www.urbanophile.com/2014/05/26/checking-in-on-columbus/