Hoosier icon vs. NBA No. 1 pick

June 23, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
jaredJust when you thought Hoosier icon Jared Fogle was being pushed aside by the $5 footlong ad campaign, he turns up in Manhattan playing hoops with soon-to-be NBA No. 1 draft pick Blake Griffin.

Today, the Oklahoma all-American laced them up against the man best known for dropping 245 pounds eating Subway sandwiches while living on the Indiana University campus.

As of 2:45 p.m. today, I was still awaiting the outcome of their game of horse. Well instead of playing horse, they played Subway. The first shooter to spell S-u-b-w-a-y, lost. I’ll post the results (hopefully) this afternoon.

Subway officials are also in the process of confirming that the action on one of New York’s best known outdoor courts was filmed for a television commercial to be released later this summer. A third guy “off the street” was brought into the game with Fogle and Griffin.

Griffin, who is projected to be drafted No. 1 in Thursday’s draft by the L.A. Clippers, announced yesterday that he signed sponsorship deals with Subway and EA Sports. Griffin, who will team with former IU guard Eric Gordon in L.A., will be the cover boy for EA’s newest college basketball video game.

"I can tell you one thing," Griffin told Fox radio this morning. "Jared's got game." 

To follow The Score on Twitter: http://twitter.com/ibjthescore.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • I don't care if the man lost 245 pounds eating fried oreos and jelly donuts. He has zero personality and has no business being on TV. It's great that he lost all this weight, but it's time for Subway to find a new character.
  • For all of you inquiring minds, Blake Griffin and Jared Fogle split their game of S-U-B-W-A-Y yesterday. One each. There is no word on when or if a rubber match will be scheduled.
  • Sorry Anything, but Subway disagrees with you. And apparently, so do most Americans. Obviously the commercial program with Jared worked or they would have dropped it. You lose, Jared wins!

    Probably would have been a blast to watch!

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT