Hoosier lessons for Obama

January 20, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Some people went ballistic when $40 million was spent on George W. Bushâ??s inauguration in 2001, and now $120 million is going toward Barack Obamaâ??s inauguration festivities today â?? much of it donated, of course.

Few people would argue against celebrating the nationâ??s first black president. Still, is Obama sending the right message at a time when the country faces so many serious problems?

Earlier this month, Gov. Mitch Daniels downsized his inauguration in recognition the state is suffering from the recession and has serious work to accomplish.

And in 2004 Ball State University President Jo Ann Gora turned down her $150,000 inauguration and put the money toward scholarships for 25 high school students.

Should Obama have taken cues from these Hoosiers?
  • I have to ask, What is this money being spent on? Where is this money coming from? Where is the money going to? Granted, $120 Million is a lot, but if we don't know where it is coming from and where it is going to, then numbers mean nothing. Norm, can you give us the list of where the money is coming from and going to?
  • Sorry, Random, I don't have the numbers. It would be great information to know.
  • Are you kidding? But for the adverse public reaction, wasn't our governor planning to jet down to BSU's football game in Alabama a few weeks ago on the taxpayer's tab? He ultimately bailed entirely, citing bad weather. His TV campaign ads provided sufficient pomp and circumstance anyway.
  • No one would dare put a crimp in the Obama Immaculation!
  • so now we have a problem with how people donate or spend their money? it seems some have a problem with how much was donated relative to what was donated to someone else. with all the money the oil companies and haliburton made during bush's 8 yrs you would figure they could have pooped $120 million and not missed it.
  • Yeah, the economy sucks, but there are still A LOT of really wealthy people in this country. If they choose to donate a million bucks to Obama's inauguration, good for them! When is the last time we saw that kind of reverence for a leader in this country? It's refreshing.
  • I guess that even though we are not informed where the donations are coming from and where it is going to, I am not making a snap decision on spending regulations until we have more solid figures. If this is truely (as G$ says) donator paying for it, then good. Spend... Spend away. If it is at the hand of the tax payers (even a little bit), I say Tisk, Tisk.

    Don't get me wrong, I support Obama for what he is worth, but we, as the US Tax Payers, shall not forcibly pay for a few days of entertainment of a few when our economy is in dire need of repair. If you want to throw your money any which direction, it should be upto you (with legal reason). I just hope that the $120 mill is of donations and out of pocket of those who attend.

    On a different note, Jo Ann Gora did what she felt was right. It is a great idea, but we should not deny someone a party because the economy is in terrible shape (unless the money is tax money). Once there is a pool of donated money, who is it to say where it goes? If there is no legal binding contract, it is upto the one with the checkbook to the bank account of the donated money.
  • Cheap shot Norm. Unless you have the facts, as you stated you didn't, why even drop this article on your blog? Trying to stir up news where it really doesn't exist? Rich ladies buy $1000 boots all the time, is it our business? Rich guys buy Ferraris, is it our business? Of course not.

    Let me ask you this: What is the source of your $120m figure, and why would you make this into something when there really is no meat to the story?


    and the fact that berwickguy is against it, makes me FOR it. :lol: -
  • wow. been a while norm. evidently nothing to report on my questions?


    its ok, its just the IBJ..... ;)

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. If what you stated is true, then this article is entirely inaccurate. "State sells bonds" is same as "State borrows money". Supposedly the company will "pay for them". But since we are paying the company, we are still paying for this road with borrowed money, even though the state has $2 billion in the bank.

  2. Andrew hit the nail on the head. AMTRAK provides terrible service and that is why the state has found a contractor to improve the service. More trips, on-time performance, better times, cleanliness and adequate or better restrooms. WI-FI and food service will also be provided. Transit from outlying areas will also be provided. I wouldn't take it the way it is but with the above services and marketing of the service,ridership will improve and more folks will explore Indy and may even want to move here.

  3. They could take the property using eminent domain and save money by not paying the church or building a soccer field and a new driveway. Ctrwd has monthly meetings open to all customers of the district. The meetings are listed and if the customers really cared that much they would show. Ctrwd works hard in every way they can to make sure the customer is put first. Overflows damage the surrounding environment and cost a lot of money every year. There have been many upgrades done through the years to help not send flow to Carmel. Even with the upgrades ctrwd cannot always keep up. I understand how a storage tank could be an eye sore, but has anyone thought to look at other lift stations or storage tanks. Most lift stations are right in the middle of neighborhoods. Some close to schools and soccer fields, and some right in back yards, or at least next to a back yard. We all have to work together to come up with a proper solution. The proposed solution by ctrwd is the best one offered so far.

  4. Fox has comments from several people that seem to have some inside information. I would refer to their website. Changed my whole opionion of this story.

  5. This place is great! I'm piggy backing and saying the Cobb salad is great. But the ribs are awesome. $6.49 for ribs and 2 sides?! They're delicious. If you work downtown, head over there.