TAFT: How to meld Christian, secular values

Bill Taft / Special to IBJ
November 2, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Bill TaftThe next legislative session is likely to feature several bills affecting “social” issues like same-sex marriage, curriculum controversies and religious activities in public schools, abortion and public prayer.

These bills will trigger debate representing two basic views, one that sees cultural Christianity as our proper “civil religion” versus a purely “secular” perspective seeing any religious involvement in government as inappropriate.

Behind these views is a basic contested question: Do we live in a Christian state or do we live in a post-Christian state where multiple world views compete to shape our government?

I believe that reaching a common understanding of this reality could help our Legislature act in our best interests.

Every Hoosier has a set of values (often expressed as a religion) that inform this debate. I am influenced by my own faith as an “orthodox” Christian. I believe the Bible claims authority over the behavior of all Christians—often in ways that go against our own desires and cultural inclinations.

However, I do not believe these biblical constraints apply in the same way to non-Christians, or that it is up to the government to enforce many of them. I understand that a secularist or someone coming from a different religious tradition might have a moral code that will differ from mine, which can trigger conflict over the proper role of government.

Societal shifts make it difficult to find common moral ground, sometimes pitting urban and rural areas against each other in the Legislature. Small-town Indiana has experienced less change in traditional moral culture, while cities have a wider variety of cultural perspectives that make them more skeptical of any attempt to enforce moral precepts through legislation.

This fragmented landscape makes it difficult to address the big challenges to our prosperity. We often resort to demonizing and attempting to overpower those with different views.

However, recent trends of declining real income, poorly distributed economic opportunity, deteriorating and outdated infrastructure, and insufficient educational progress constitute such a large threat to Indiana’s future that we must find common moral priorities to shape legislation.

The only way to find practical common ground is for Christians and secularists to acknowledge that neither dominate culture, and that they must find common ground around practical, specific government action for the common good. I believe that my fellow Christians should spend less energy bemoaning the moral decline of society, and instead focus on faithfully applying their beliefs to serve their neighbors.

Christians can learn from biblical passages such as Jeremiah’s letter to the captive Jews living in Babylon, instructing them to “seek the welfare of the city where I have sent you into exile, and pray to the Lord on its behalf, for in its welfare you will find your welfare.”

Secularists need to understand that Christian neighbors are motivated by a belief in a revealed “Truth” that will give them strong convictions.

The key to finding common public ground is to see these conflicting views as containing shared practical aspirations, and to focus on achieving social goals that align with these common priorities instead of bashing each other over “incorrect” beliefs.•


Taft is executive director of Local Initiatives Support Corp., a not-for-profit that invests in neighborhood redevelopment projects. Send comments on this column to ibjedit@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. why oh why does this state continue to elect these people....do you wonder how much was graft out of the 3.8 billion?

  2. i too think this is a great idea. I think the vision and need is there as well. But also agree with Wendy that there may be better location in our city to fulfill this vision and help grow the sports of hockey and figure skating in Indy. Also to help further develop other parts of the city that seem often forgotten. Any of the other 6 townships out side of the three northernmost could benefit greatly from a facility and a vision like this. For a vision that sounds philanthropic, the location is appears more about the money. Would really like to see it elsewhere, but still wish the development the best of luck, as we can always use more ice in the city. As for the Ice growth when they return, if schedules can be coordinated with the Fuel, what could be better than to have high level hockey available to go see every weekend of the season? Good luck with the development and the return of the Ice.

  3. How many parking spaces do they have at Ironworks? Will residents have reserved spaces or will they have to troll for a space among the people that are there at Ruth Chris & Sangiovese?

  4. You do not get speeding ticket first time you speed and this is not first time Mr.Page has speed. One act should not define a man and this one act won't. He got off with a slap on the wrist. I agree with judge no person was injured by his actions. The state was robbed of money by paying too much rent for a building and that money could have been used for social services. The Page family maybe "generous" with their money but for most part all of it is dirty money that he obtained for sources that are not on the upright. Page is the kind of lawyer that gives lawyers a bad name. He paid off this judge like he has many other tine and walked away. Does he still have his license. I believe so. Hire him to get you confiscated drug money back. He will. It will cost you.

  5. I remain amazed at the level of expertise of the average Internet Television Executive. Obviously they have all the answers and know the business inside and out.