IBJNews

Hurco suffers loss despite better sales

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Hurco Cos. Inc. suffered a loss of $1.5 million in its second fiscal quarter although sales improved in Europe and Asia, the Indianapolis-based machine tool maker announced Friday morning.

The loss in the period ended April 30, which translated to 24 cents per share, was much larger than the loss of $281,000, or 4 cents per share, a year earlier. The decrease in profit as a percentage of sales was due to the impact of fixed costs on lower sales and production volume and a higher mix of sales from the Asia Pacific region where competitive pricing pressures remain strong, Hurco said.

Revenue increased 17 percent, to $24 million.

Hurco attributed the loss to an increase in sales and service fees coupled with a weaker U.S. dollar when translating foreign sales for financial reporting purposes.

However, foreign sales in the second fiscal quarter improved in Asia and Europe, where demand for Hurco’s products climbed 131 percent and 18 percent, respectively. Sales in North America dipped 6 percent.

Orders in the second quarter increased 69 percent, to $30.5 million.

Hurco CEO Michael Doar warned in a prepared statement that future sales in Europe may be affected by the economic uncertainty there.

“We are encouraged that orders for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 were up 48 percent compared to the first quarter of this year and were higher than any quarter since the economic recession began,” he said. “However, sales in Europe may be impacted due to continuing weak economic conditions.”

Hurco shares opened trading Friday morning at $17.37 cents each.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT