Hurry up and wait for MSA

July 6, 2007
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
City officials gave developers a tight, two-month time frame to come up with a second round of proposals to redevelop the Market Square Arena site. Alarm ClockThe RFP was issued Feb. 21, and proposals were due April 18. A decision was promised by late June or early July. Guess what? The city missed its deadline. Don't expect an answer until next month, at the earliest. They're still saying summer, but a little later in the summer. "We're just making sure we get all our questions answered and know everything that's going on," said Department of Metropolitan Development spokeswoman Anne Coffey. For a refresher on the two proposals, check here and here. Tick, tock.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • If an empty gravel parking lot fails to become a real estate development this many times, is it safe to assume it's never going to evolve?

    Discuss.

    (Corollary: Since the City has missed this deadline so many times, does that mean I'm in the clear paying my property tax bill a few months late, too?)
  • Charlotte, don't kick us when we're down! We know you're about to get a new Trump tower in your downtown thats among the dozens of real high rises going up. I wish we could get ONE highrise. :-(
  • The constant delays really make me angry
  • This is pretty disrespectful to the developers. If you wonder why we get crappy architecture in downtown, I guess you can just look at the way we jerk around the people that will build it.
  • Of course this development will do nothing to relieve the tax burden, because I'm sure there's an abatement on the property. Just like those who bought million dollar condos in the Conrad.
  • But like all abatements, they are phased out and end up paying full taxes which will lighten the burden. In addition, I believe the building has an abatement, but not the indivudual condos. Not positive, but I think it is illegal to abate residential properties.
  • indyman, many residential properties have tax abatements. Homes in Fall Creek Place and Martindale on the Monon are some to name a few.
  • indyman, you'd be surprised to know that the fat cats buying into the Conrad have tax abatements for their residences.

    Tax abatements for business for the right deals are good, because they spur development, job growth, etc. And I think they are ok, but less defensible, for residential or retail redevelopment projects in rough areas. With reason, of course.

    Now, don't get me started on the failure of our glorious public officials to reassess business property. Wait, we were supposed to do that?
  • Why on earth do the condos in the Conrad need tax abatements?!
  • I am actually pleased with this delay! I felt that the City was pushing too hard/fast for a new proposal. My guess is that the City is taking the best options from each proposal and making them into one great project. I wish that they would just develop one of the parcels and make it a really tall tower and leave the other for the future.
  • Hopefully the city will demo the old Bank One ops center. That has become grand central station for the drunks who can't get into Wheeler. Have you walked by there ever? Smells like, well, not good from a block away.
  • I agree that they should develop the parcels separately. Maybe both dont' have to be developed at the same time either. It would be nice to have a highrise on at least one of the blocks.

    But with property taxes as high as they are now, I see a decline in the d'town condo market coming on.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT