Hurry up and wait for MSA

July 6, 2007
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
City officials gave developers a tight, two-month time frame to come up with a second round of proposals to redevelop the Market Square Arena site. Alarm ClockThe RFP was issued Feb. 21, and proposals were due April 18. A decision was promised by late June or early July. Guess what? The city missed its deadline. Don't expect an answer until next month, at the earliest. They're still saying summer, but a little later in the summer. "We're just making sure we get all our questions answered and know everything that's going on," said Department of Metropolitan Development spokeswoman Anne Coffey. For a refresher on the two proposals, check here and here. Tick, tock.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • If an empty gravel parking lot fails to become a real estate development this many times, is it safe to assume it's never going to evolve?

    Discuss.

    (Corollary: Since the City has missed this deadline so many times, does that mean I'm in the clear paying my property tax bill a few months late, too?)
  • Charlotte, don't kick us when we're down! We know you're about to get a new Trump tower in your downtown thats among the dozens of real high rises going up. I wish we could get ONE highrise. :-(
  • The constant delays really make me angry
  • This is pretty disrespectful to the developers. If you wonder why we get crappy architecture in downtown, I guess you can just look at the way we jerk around the people that will build it.
  • Of course this development will do nothing to relieve the tax burden, because I'm sure there's an abatement on the property. Just like those who bought million dollar condos in the Conrad.
  • But like all abatements, they are phased out and end up paying full taxes which will lighten the burden. In addition, I believe the building has an abatement, but not the indivudual condos. Not positive, but I think it is illegal to abate residential properties.
  • indyman, many residential properties have tax abatements. Homes in Fall Creek Place and Martindale on the Monon are some to name a few.
  • indyman, you'd be surprised to know that the fat cats buying into the Conrad have tax abatements for their residences.

    Tax abatements for business for the right deals are good, because they spur development, job growth, etc. And I think they are ok, but less defensible, for residential or retail redevelopment projects in rough areas. With reason, of course.

    Now, don't get me started on the failure of our glorious public officials to reassess business property. Wait, we were supposed to do that?
  • Why on earth do the condos in the Conrad need tax abatements?!
  • I am actually pleased with this delay! I felt that the City was pushing too hard/fast for a new proposal. My guess is that the City is taking the best options from each proposal and making them into one great project. I wish that they would just develop one of the parcels and make it a really tall tower and leave the other for the future.
  • Hopefully the city will demo the old Bank One ops center. That has become grand central station for the drunks who can't get into Wheeler. Have you walked by there ever? Smells like, well, not good from a block away.
  • I agree that they should develop the parcels separately. Maybe both dont' have to be developed at the same time either. It would be nice to have a highrise on at least one of the blocks.

    But with property taxes as high as they are now, I see a decline in the d'town condo market coming on.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. "This was a very localized, Indiana issue," he said. As in, Indiana failed to expand Medicaid to cover its poor citizens resulting in the loss of essential medical services, including this EMS company. Well done, Indiana GOP. Here are the real death panels: GOP state governments who refuse to expand Medicaid for political reasons.

  2. In the "one for all, all for none" socialist doctrine the sick die...this plus obama"care" equates to caucasian genocide plus pushed flight to cities thus further eroding the conservative base and the continualed spiral toward complete liberal/progressive/marxist America.

  3. There is a simple reason why WISH is not reporting on this story. LIN has others stations in different markets that are affiliated with CBS. Reporting about CBS blindsiding WISH/LIN due to CBS's greed and bullying tatics would risk any future negoations LIN will have with CBS in other markets.

  4. My best always! Dave Wilson

  5. How did Columbus, Ohio pull off a car share service without a single dollar of public subsidies? They must not have a mayor who is on the take like Indianapolis. Daimler Benz offers Columbus residents their Smart Cars on a market-driven basis: "This has some neat features. Cars don’t have to be picked up and dropped off at fixed points. You find one with your smart phone based on GPS, and drop it off anywhere in the service area you can find a spot – even at a meter. These cars aren’t required to feed the meter so you get free on street parking while using them. I was told this system was put in place on a market basis without subsidies – and that the vendor actually pays the city for the use of the meters." http://www.urbanophile.com/2014/05/26/checking-in-on-columbus/

ADVERTISEMENT