IBJ Night at the Movies

January 3, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Want to join us at an advance screening of one of the most critically acclaimed movies of the year?

I’ll get to how in a second.

First, I wanted to ask if critics—of books, art, concerts, whatever—have influenced where you’ve decided to spend your arts and entertainment money and time.

As someone who reviews every week (you can see the latest at ibj.com), I’m always interested in how reviews are used.  Post your thoughts below.

OK, now about that movie night.

Be among the first 50 people to e-mail lharry@ibj.com and we’ll set you up with a pair of tickets to the next IBJ Night at the Movies, featuring “There Will Be Blood,” the latest from Paul Thomas Anderson, writer/director of “Magnolia,” and “Boogie Nights.”

Inspired by Upton Sinclair’s novel “Oil!”, the epic film stars Daniel Day-Lewis. It opens in theaters Jan. 18, but we’ve got a screening on Thursday the 17th at AMC College Park. More information can be found at www.therewillbeblood.com.

Showtime is 7 p.m., but you should arrive early since passes do not guarantee seats. No purchase necessary, of course. The film is rated R for some violence.

We’ll be looking for your comments on the film here on Jan. 18.
  • I pay far more attention to the opinions of critics regarding movies than anything other form of entertainment. Even then, I generally take such critiques with a grain of salt. I feel confident enough in my knowledge of music and theatre to know what I will like, but I still find it interesting to hear what others have to say.
  • I give more weight to certain reviewers than others. I basically agree with the previous post. I know what I like. Sometimes, if a movie I was sort of interested in gets slammed all around, I'll probably just wait for dvd rather than spend my money at the theatre. The other thing I look at if I'm planning to see a movie and have a few to choose from is to look at the reviewers quotes attached to the movies advertisement. If it doesn't have many endorsements or if the endorsements seem slight or by obscure reviewers, I may pass on it for something else. Unless it's something I really want to see - meaning a favorite actor or movie based on a favorite book or character.

    Regarding books - I really read alot of classics, so critics reviews aren't so much involved in that. They're books that have stood the test of time. When I do read newer literature I look for the number of reviews on the book cover and who they are. If it's only got a couple of reviews and they're from some obscure publication I may pass or possibly look for it at a book sale or the library. I won't buy it, unless it's an author I really like, then I may go ahead and give it shot regardless.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. If what you stated is true, then this article is entirely inaccurate. "State sells bonds" is same as "State borrows money". Supposedly the company will "pay for them". But since we are paying the company, we are still paying for this road with borrowed money, even though the state has $2 billion in the bank.

  2. Andrew hit the nail on the head. AMTRAK provides terrible service and that is why the state has found a contractor to improve the service. More trips, on-time performance, better times, cleanliness and adequate or better restrooms. WI-FI and food service will also be provided. Transit from outlying areas will also be provided. I wouldn't take it the way it is but with the above services and marketing of the service,ridership will improve and more folks will explore Indy and may even want to move here.

  3. They could take the property using eminent domain and save money by not paying the church or building a soccer field and a new driveway. Ctrwd has monthly meetings open to all customers of the district. The meetings are listed and if the customers really cared that much they would show. Ctrwd works hard in every way they can to make sure the customer is put first. Overflows damage the surrounding environment and cost a lot of money every year. There have been many upgrades done through the years to help not send flow to Carmel. Even with the upgrades ctrwd cannot always keep up. I understand how a storage tank could be an eye sore, but has anyone thought to look at other lift stations or storage tanks. Most lift stations are right in the middle of neighborhoods. Some close to schools and soccer fields, and some right in back yards, or at least next to a back yard. We all have to work together to come up with a proper solution. The proposed solution by ctrwd is the best one offered so far.

  4. Fox has comments from several people that seem to have some inside information. I would refer to their website. Changed my whole opionion of this story.

  5. This place is great! I'm piggy backing and saying the Cobb salad is great. But the ribs are awesome. $6.49 for ribs and 2 sides?! They're delicious. If you work downtown, head over there.