Illegal smiles: Pot comedy returns

July 29, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Variety reports today that "Up in Smoke" comedy legends Cheech and Chong will be hitting the road for the first time in 25 years. Their national tour, titled "Hey, What's that Smell?" will be announced tomorrow.

Meanwhile, the latest comedy from Judd ("Knocked Up") Apatow arrives in theaters soon. "Pineapple Express," about a stoner (Seth Rogen, big surprise) and his dealer on the run, opens next week.

A trend? A reflection of how pot has become an acceptable part of society? Or is it just fun to watch wasted people? And can "Bill and Ted!: The Musical" be far behind?

Your thoughts?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • It is just fun to watch wasted and high people.
  • It's more fun to BE a wasted or high person watching wasted or high people, LOL/JK

    Dave's not here...
  • It serves as a reminder that if marijuana were legalized in this country, hundreds of thousands of people wouldn't be sent to prison every year for possession, and thousands of law enforcement officers could devote their efforts to fighting real crimes.
  • Who knew Cheech and Chong were still alive??!!

    (or are they??)
  • Darn baby boomers...wanting to reminisce. Some of us can relate as we watch scenes unfold in a pungently smokey room. Gosh, I wonder if C&C will be able to pull this off? Will they be able to remember their schtick or will it be real time?

    Acceptable? Seems quite a few people, including professionals, continue to use weed recreationally - just not in front of their neighbors. So it is acceptable just not openly. It's a cockatil, of sorts, that is smoked. I'm going to stop before it sounds like I've been imbibing (and I haven't) - just afternoon ramblings.
  • It is not only acceptable, it is natural. If the drug makers could figure out a way to patent it, it would be legal. Funny society that makes something so natural illegal while pushing there own concoctions such as prozac and the like. Actually, it's not funny, it's profit and all about the numbers. Cheers to C&C. Welcome back. Not all pot smokers are stoners stuck on the couch. Some of us are very productive.
  • Echoing Mike above....if you have every spent any time in the Indiana prison system (let me define this...I worked in a support role) you would understand how much we spend, as taxpayers, to house and feed non-violent criminals whose worse offense is some pot. Marijuana was made illegal in the '30's due to racism (black jazz players in the east, Mexicans in the west) and because of William Randolph Hearst didn't want hemp in competion with the vast tracts of forests that he had to feed his empire focused on yellow journalism. Plus, Dupont did not want hemp as supplanting their new discovery-nylon. So follow the money folks. But let's continue to allow the few to dictate their bigotry, morals and financial interests to define what is best for the masses.
  • clearly it should be legal. otherwise someone would get on here and make a speech about it. i have yet to meet one person that thinks it should be illegal and i work in a professional environment. safer than prescription drugs and booze. usually more fun.
  • Yikes! Do you people realize that about 65 cents out of every dollar you folks spend on reefer goes to fund a war somewhere. The type of war that puts guns in the hands of children and victimizes tens of millions of innocent people every year. Most of that grass you folks are smoking doesn't come from your neighbors basement or back yards, it comes from a war monger in a third world corner. Smoke it up my friends. Smoke it up.
  • Merv:
    That's the best reason in the world to legalize it. When we had prohibition who brought the liquor to the masses? Who had the wars in the streets of Chicago and other metro areas? Organized crime, not much different than the 3rd world countries you are talking about. Legalize it, cultivate it on farms and tax it. Not such a bizarre idea.
  • FYI: The tour will be comign to the Murat Theatre September 19.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I still don't understand how the FBI had any right whatsoever to investigate this elderly collector. Before the Antiquities Act it was completely legal to buy, trade or collect Native American artifacts. I used to see arrow heads, axes, bowls, corn grinders at antique shops and flea markets for sale and I bought them myself. But that was in the late 60's and early 70's. And I now know that people used to steal items from sites and sell them. I understand that is illegal. But we used to find arrow heads and even a corn grinder in our back yard when I was a child. And I still have those items today in my small collection.

  2. I lived in California and they had many of the things noted in the proposed suggestions from the "Blue Ribbon Panel". California is near financial collapse now. Let's not turn the great state of Indiana into a third world dump like California.

  3. The temporary closure of BR Avenue will get a lot of attention. But, one thing reported by the IndyStar really stands out to me, and is extraordinarily depressing: “Police also have agreed to crack down on noise violations, traffic violations and public intoxication.” In other words, the police have generously agreed to do their jobs (temporarily, at least), instead of just standing around waiting for someone to call 911. When is someone in this department going to get off their fat arse (looking at you, Chief), get their minds out of 1975-era policing and into 2014, and have his department engage in pro-active work instead of sitting around waiting for someone to be shot? Why in the hell does it take 7 people getting shot in one night in one of the city’s biggest tourist destinations, to convince the police (reluctantly, it would appear) that they actually need to do their f’n jobs? When is the Chief going to realize that there’s a huge, direct, proven correlation between enforcing the law (yes, all laws, especially those affecting quality of life) and preventing larger crimes from occurring? Is it racial BS? Is that what this extraordinary reluctance is all about? Is the department and the city terrified that if they do their jobs, they might offend someone? Whom, exactly? Will the victims of violence, murder, assault, rape, robbery, and theft be offended? Will the citizens who have to tolerate their deteriorating quality of life be offended? Will the businesses who see their customers flee be offended? Or, is it simple ignorance (maybe the Chief hasn’t heard about NYC’s success in fighting crime - it’s only the biggest g*&#am city in the country, after all)? Either way, Chief, if you don’t want to do your job, then step down. Let someone who actually wants the job take it.

  4. I thought Indiana had all the funding it needed for everything. That's why the state lottery and casino gambling were allowed, as the new tax revenue would take care of everything the state wanted to do.The recommendations sound like they came from California. Better think about that. What is the financial condition of that state?

  5. I was a fan of WIBC in the morning, Steve was the only WIBC host that I listened too, he gave the news with so much flare that I enjoyed listening to him on my way to work. Katz is no Steve. Sadly, I will not be listening to WIBC anymore.

ADVERTISEMENT