Impressions of settling lawsuits

July 1, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Eli Lilly and Co. settled its racial discrimination lawsuit yesterday for $64,000, ending a claim by an employee who alleged the company fired her because she was disfigured through exposure to a blood pathogen.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission said Lilly retaliated against the African-American woman after she filed a discrimination charge. In offering the settlement, Lilly denied violating laws or regulations.

Companies increasingly settle charges of various kinds without admitting guilt.

When they do, how does it come across to you?

Do you think to yourself, the company must be guilty or they wouldnâ??t have paid out the money? That the company made a business decision to end the negative publicity and legal costs?

Something else?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Not just the Equal Employment Opportunity laws out there, but the Genetic Discrimination laws could have benefited this Woman's case. It is cheaper both on the pocketbook and the negative publicity to settle than it is to fight cases where there is any shadow of a doubt of that there could be any genetic discrimination.

    We don't know the whole story of both sides to make the decision of Lilly's Guilty or the ex-employee is try to make a quick buck Unfortunately there are cases out there where the ex-employee is trying to make a quick buck because of race, gender, or another genetic related difference. The true question is How do you handle someone who could potentially sue you for Discrimination when he/she is repetitively refuse to follow the rules of the company?

    Some Big companies will just pay the ex-employee off to just get past the issue, like lilly has done.
  • One of the distinguishing features about settlements, as opposed to judgments, is that no one except the parties has any idea of what the facts and the evidence was, so any conclusions are invalid from the start. It has been said : A bad settlement is better than a good lawsuit. Let's leave it at that.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. The Fringe! Plus, the simple fact that there are so many local faves in such close proximity to each other.

  2. I remenber, watching the toll road, being built, through South Bend, when I was 10 years old. I believe, back then that it was estimated, that the toll road, would be paid for in 20 years and then it would be free. I am now 71, what happened? Since the power is in the people, by that, I mean that, we the people are in total control of everything. I, suggest that no one ever use the toll road again, let it go broke. We the people can control the price of everything, from groceries to gas, if we would just do it. If we don't pay the asking price, the sellers will lower the price and if we wait awhile, they will lower the price to what we accept as reasonable. I would like to know why a highway like interstate 94, is so well maintained, a much better highway, than the toll road, but has no tolls. I would also like to know why, a sitting governor, with a term limit, maximum of eight years, can lease, public property, for 75 years. Even though I have transponders in both of my trucks and will not be affected by the increase, I have been and will contine to avoid using the toll road. I make many trips from northern Indiana to Chicago, every year, and I prefer the better highway, I94!

  3. Coming from her background,she should be used to those kinds of advances! Menard probably figured it was ok to tuck a buck!

  4. I'm still waiting for the list of available, high quality apartments in the Village.

  5. This criminal masquerading as a lawyer obviously has serious issues. He’s been proven by his own testimony to be a pathological liar and probably has a personality disorder as he seems to be constructing a reality around himself. He places no value on truth, honesty or loyalty as evidenced by what he has done to his clients and his own family. And by the demands and lies he has made in court, it is evident he feels entitled to do and say whatever suits his purpose and everyone else is expected to nod obediently and believe him because he is, after all, Bill Super Lawyer; or BS lawyer for short. This millionaire wanna-be no longer owns anything of value; he squandered it and put everything he had into foreclosure. He has no money, house, car, boat or vacation home left to show for what he earned or what he stole. He’s just another loser without morals who will be doing time. I’m certain all of his courtroom shenanigans are antagonizing his poor victims. As Lamar said, his behavior and claims in court have been outrageous. The judge needs to be more than concerned; he needs to be judicial and end this nonsense.

ADVERTISEMENT