January 15, 2011
IBJ StaffPeople listings are free.
More
January 8, 2011
People listings are free.
More
January 1, 2011
People listings are free.
More
December 25, 2010
IBJ StaffPeople listings are free.
More
December 18, 2010
People listings are free.
More
December 11, 2010
People listings are free.
More
December 4, 2010
IBJ StaffPeople listings are free.
More
November 27, 2010
People listings are free.
More
November 20, 2010
IBJ StaffPeople listings are free.
More
November 6, 2010
People listings are free.
More
October 30, 2010
People listings are free.
More
October 23, 2010
IBJ StaffPeople listings are free.
More
October 16, 2010
People listings are free.
More
October 9, 2010
People listings are free.
More
October 2, 2010
People listings are free.
More
September 18, 2010
People listings are free.
More
September 11, 2010
People listings are free.
More
September 4, 2010
People listings are free.
More
August 28, 2010
People listings are free.
More
August 21, 2010
People listings are free.
More
August 14, 2010
People listings are free.
More
August 7, 2010
People listings are free.
More
July 31, 2010
People listings are free.
More
July 24, 2010
IBJ StaffPeople listings are free.
More
July 17, 2010
People listings are free.
More
These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.
The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)
As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.
The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.
I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.