![]() INSIDE DISH: Carmel eatery unafraid to break a few eggs, rulesNovember 2, 2012
Restaurateur Larry Hanes stuck to his guns in creating Eggshell Bistro, bending conventions with
eclectic decor, artisanal coffees, and a simple menu with restrained portions.More. |
|
Rewind: IBJ.com's 10 most popular videos of 2012December 19, 2012
|
INSIDE DISH: New partners boost sales at PureOctober 12, 2012
Receipts at the locavore's haven in Fountain Square have surged
since February, when two new partners took over day-to-day management, redefined the space, expanded the menu and turned its
hours of operation upside down.More. |
INSIDE DISH: Unlikely pair pilot Ship to profitJuly 20, 2012
OK, so an accountant and a tattoo artist start a bar. Except it's no joke. Clearly defined roles have helped the
odd-couple co-owners of The Sinking Ship navigate a turbulent startup and land on solid financial ground.More. |
INSIDE DISH: Smokers' haven prepares for banMay 30, 2012
Mass Avenue Pub survived a two-year hiatus in the mid-2000s after a massive infrastructure collapse. Its owners think
going smokeless on Friday will be a comparative breeze, even though 65 percent of their clientele like to light up.More. |
I know how corrupt Federal Judge Sarah Evans Barker is, the Media hides the truth of Barker's corruption. Barker is very unfit for her position. Norman Flick
digdeeper on the quest on how and when they started. Call Center? Sister was with FSSA and quit why? Staff background? Secrets and cover-ups? Any arrests? There's more to this story.
On April 24,2003 the U.S. District Court Southern District of Indiana the Honorable Sarah Evans Barker entered a Judgment pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 USC 405(g) of the Social Security Act that i believe requires SSA to grant DIB. It is well established Law that is a final appeallable Judgment Shalala v Schaefer (1993)the Appeal time ran in this case and the Honorable Judge awarded $6,339.50 in EAJA Fees. The plain language of EAJA says the party must be the prevailing party,the Govts position must be substaintially unjustified,the Judgment must be final and include an order of settlement.Case#IP02-565-C-B/S now the Attorneys in this case got $6,339.50 for winning in the Court but to this day Dec.9,2012 i have'nt recieved anything from this Judgment and it has Finiancally and physically destroyed my life at now 60 yrs old. Lack of due process and constitutional violations by the Govt that deprived me of a legal ruling.