![]() LEADING QUESTIONS: Mainstreet CEO masters efficiencyFebruary 27, 2013
What are Zeke Turner's top five strategies for keeping his work week under 40 hours? Do you really need work e-mail
on your smart phone? What's it like to take a company public? The real estate exec has answers.More. |
|
LEADING QUESTIONS: Mind Trust CEO takes stock of IPS reform proposalJanuary 11, 2013
What exactly does The Mind Trust do? What happened to its report on
remaking IPS? Do you need teaching experience to reform education? David Harris has answers.More. |
Rewind: IBJ.com's 10 most popular videos of 2012December 19, 2012
|
LEADING QUESTIONS: Community guru preps new HQNovember 16, 2012
How did the leader of one of Indy's top neighborhood development groups help save part of the City Market? How did
he help spark the Super Bowl legacy project? Any advice for home rehabs? Bill Taft has answers.More. |
LEADING QUESTIONS: GOP pillar reflects on party, mentors and LegislatureOctober 23, 2012
How deep are the roots in J. Murray Clark's political family tree? What still stings
from the former state GOP chairman's tenure? How does he view the party today? What about fundraising tips? Clark has
answers.More. |
I know how corrupt Federal Judge Sarah Evans Barker is, the Media hides the truth of Barker's corruption. Barker is very unfit for her position. Norman Flick
digdeeper on the quest on how and when they started. Call Center? Sister was with FSSA and quit why? Staff background? Secrets and cover-ups? Any arrests? There's more to this story.
On April 24,2003 the U.S. District Court Southern District of Indiana the Honorable Sarah Evans Barker entered a Judgment pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 USC 405(g) of the Social Security Act that i believe requires SSA to grant DIB. It is well established Law that is a final appeallable Judgment Shalala v Schaefer (1993)the Appeal time ran in this case and the Honorable Judge awarded $6,339.50 in EAJA Fees. The plain language of EAJA says the party must be the prevailing party,the Govts position must be substaintially unjustified,the Judgment must be final and include an order of settlement.Case#IP02-565-C-B/S now the Attorneys in this case got $6,339.50 for winning in the Court but to this day Dec.9,2012 i have'nt recieved anything from this Judgment and it has Finiancally and physically destroyed my life at now 60 yrs old. Lack of due process and constitutional violations by the Govt that deprived me of a legal ruling.