Indiana agrees to $3M settlement in school test hitch

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The company that conducts standardized testing for Indiana schools has agreed to reimburse the state $3 million for glitches that disrupted the testing system last year, the state's schools chief said Wednesday.

Some members of the State Board of Education said they were stunned Wednesday when Indiana Schools Superintendent Glenda Ritz announced her department had reached the settlement with CTB/McGraw-Hill last October.

"I don't remember talking about any of this," said Brad Oliver, a Republican board member and frequent opponent of Ritz's. "It's my understanding of the statute is the board has to be involved in the contract, so it seems to me like it would be reasonable those things would be discussed."

The delayed announcement enflamed criticism of Indiana's schools system, which U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan has said is in "deep dysfunction." The settlement comes as online testing problems have sprung up across the country, including in Florida, Kansas and Washington.

Oklahoma's attorney general announced an investigation of the testing company, shortly after a second year of testing glitches hit the state's students. Oklahoma Schools Superintendent Janet Barresi convinced her state's board of education last month to terminate its contract with the company.

CTB/McGraw-Hill spokesman Brian Belardi said the testing disruptions in Oklahoma were more limited this year than in 2013, but did not know why the state chose now to take action against the company. Oklahoma and CTB reached a $1.2 million settlement over the 2013 test disruptions.

An overloading of CTB's testing servers caused thousands of students to be kicked off their online Indiana Statewide Testing for Educational Progress-Plus tests in spring 2013. An independent reviewer said the disruptions had little effect on overall performance.

Indiana is extending CTB's contract for a year because of a federal request that the state establish a new test for 2014-2015 in order to keep its waiver from the No Child Left Behind Act. But the state is opening the bidding for student testing in the 2015-2016 school year.

CTB/McGraw-Hill President Ellen Haley, who was at the Indiana board meeting to talk about the spring 2015 test being developed, said she was disappointed to hear so much consternation about the settlement.

"We intend to do everything that is said in there, which is more than what's required in the contract, significantly more," she said.

Before testing began this year in Indiana, many schools opted to move to pencil and paper rather than take the test online. Christel House Academy, the charter school at the center of Indiana's grade-changing scandal last year, suffered sharp drops in student scores when taking the test online last year. So the school switched to pencil and paper and their scores returned to normal.

Critics of the growing importance of "high-stakes" student testing said that the rush to implement the tests is causing many of the problems.

Bob Schaeffer, public education director for the National Center for Fair and Open Testing, said that school infrastructure is a major problem as states begin using online testing. He said outdated computers, limited bandwidth and over-stressed company servers lead to failures like many states have been seeing.

"Like many other policies, politicians imposed new requirements without allowing enough time for thorough development and trial-testing," Schaeffer wrote in an email.


  • Board Is Not the Manager
    The Board does not manage. That is the Superintendent's job. The Board is supposed to provide oversight and input on key policies. Negotiating a contract modification is not what a Board usually does unless it is in the micromanagement mode, which the Indiana Board seems to be stuck in.
  • donations
    Ok let's make sure teachers unions and teachers can't donate either.
  • Work with all Boards
    This is not a political party issue. Any good executive knows they must keep their Board informed of all major issues ( good or bad ). Ritz has not learned this very basic rule of business. How could she have reached the level of management she has and not understand that you have to work with your board. If this was a business and not Indiana Politics she would have been fired.
  • Going from computer to paper allows easy cheating.
    I tend to not believe that Christel House, or any schools grades, went up because of computer problems. Paper test are easy to cheat with....extra time, classroom help...etc. We need to remove the emphasis from the test (and emphasis of giving charter schools to political friends) No...when one political party (Governor Pence) assigns all members to the board, it is not impartial. The committee has no Democratic member except in name. We need a law that all schools..charter/private/public are not allowed to make political donations. That law would really help our school children and the selling of education funds. Christel House Academy
    • Please Stay on This Story
      Dear IBJ author... Please stay on this story. Seems like the standard news media is taking Superintendent Ritz's press releases of poor treatment by the State Board of Education as "truth" with little to no investigation or reporting. Even a Democratic member of the board has written letter to the Indy Star complaining about Superintendent Ritz's actions and lack of cooperation with the Board. For some reason she seems to believe that she does not answer to the Board. This article is just another explample. Most CEO would be fired over such action. We need more details to who is trying to play within the rules and who is just trying to make potilical points. The education of our youth is too important. The Teachers Union is sending very one sided emails to its membership but they strike me as just re-worked press releases from the Superintendent.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ