Indiana appeals ruling throwing out right-to-work law

Associated Press
September 12, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana is appealing a ruling declaring the state's right-to-work law unconstitutional, Attorney General Greg Zoeller said Thursday.

Zoeller's office filed a notice of appeal seeking a reversal of a Lake County judge's ruling last week that the 2012 law violates the Indiana constitution.

"We are asking the Indiana Supreme Court to reverse the lower court's decision and find the statute is constitutional," Zoeller said.

An attorney for Local 150 of the International Union of Operating Engineers, which is fighting the law in both state and federal courts, said it welcomes the opportunity to argue its case that the statute wrongly requires unions to represent workers who do not pay union dues.

Lake Superior Court Judge John Sedia sided with the union when he ruled the law violates a constitutional provision barring the delivery of services "without just compensation."

The union's general counsel, Dale Pierson, said in a phone interview that Sedia "took a very common-sense, down-to-earth view of this problem" of not compensating unions for services they provide to members of bargaining units whether they want to belong to the union or not.

"I think it's appropriate to just say the right-to-work law would deprive us of the right to be compensated for those services," Pierson said.

The union attorney said he argued that very point Thursday when the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in Chicago on Local 150's appeal of a federal ruling upholding the law. In a separate case, the United Steelworkers also is using the fair compensation argument in its own federal court challenge of the law, Pierson said.

The appeal continues a battle between union members and Indiana Republicans who signed off on the measure last year. Indiana became the first state in the Rust Belt to approve right-to-work after two chaotic sessions of the Indiana General Assembly marked by a walkout of House Democrats in 2011 and periodic boycotts by the same caucus in 2012.

Local 150, based in suburban Chicago, has members in northwestern Indiana.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.