Indiana counties wrestling with tax overpayment

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

City and county officials across Indiana are starting to wrestle with how they'll deal with the state's plan to recoup roughly $610 million it overpaid local governments for income taxes it expected to collect.

State officials blame the recession for throwing off tax revenue estimates that led to the extra money being paid to local governments over the past three years. Nearly all of Indiana's 92 counties will see money withheld from future tax distributions in order to settle the overpayment.

Howard County Treasurer Martha Lake said her county was overpaid $10.1 million and is looking at a decline of about 5 percent in local income tax revenue for next year under the state's plan to base distributions on 2011 tax collections.

State officials will use this year's collections as a base line and withhold additional money in coming years toward the counties' debt.

"This didn't happen overnight," Lake told the Kokomo Tribune. "It is their responsibility to get the money back. We hope the collections increase."

Bob Lain, assistant director of the Indiana State Budget Agency, said the repayment process is similar to one used in 2000, but the amount of that overpayment was much less.

"The current recession is not comparable to the one of several years ago," he said.

The current amount of indebtedness is an estimate and new figures will be provided to the counties, Lain said.

Bloomington City Controller Michael Trexler said that the city would likely see about $200,000 less than expected from its share of local income taxes, which are collected by the state and then distributed to county governments for disbursement among cities, towns, libraries and other local government units.

Trexler said the city received $7.4 million in local income tax revenue for 2011, and it included a similar amount in its 2012 budget planning.

The shortfall could be absorbed by cash reserves in the proposed 2012 budget, but Trexler said it still would be a significant cut.

"What happens with this kind of a hit is that it eats into the reserve," Trexler told The Herald-Times. "That reserve doesn't automatically replenish itself. It takes a lot of hard work to build up."

Some local officials, however, are questioning whether the state's overpayment figures are correct.

Grant County Auditor Roger Bainbridge said a state report showing a $3.2 million overpayment to his county strains credibility.

Bainbridge said would amount to nearly one-third of $11 million that was expected this year from Grant County's 2.25 percent income tax, the Chronicle-Tribune of Marion reported.

"Taking the state's word for something that is so incredulous is not in my nature," he said. "I want to make sure no one made a mistake."


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.