Indiana: Feds delayed No Child Left Behind report

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Department of Education officials said Tuesday that they expected to hear about concerns with the state's No Child Left Behind waiver last fall, but federal monitors delayed releasing the report until last month without explanation.

Superintendent of Public Instruction Glenda Ritz said Indiana originally was promised the report 45 days after U.S. Department of Education monitors flew to the state last August. She also said her department has been working hard since she took office to implement the waiver, which was crafted by former Superintendent Tony Bennett, whom she defeated in November 2012.

"Did the department know we had work to do? You betcha," she said Tuesday. "We were told we were going to get this in October."

However the report was delivered last month, catching many in the state off guard. A spokeswoman for U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan did not immediately return a request for comment Tuesday.

Federal education officials alerted the state that its waiver may be in jeopardy because of problems monitoring low-performing schools and conducting teacher evaluations, as well as the state's decision to withdraw from Common Core.

News that the waiver might be in jeopardy surprised many members of the State Board of Education, who called for a special meeting to grill the Department of Education. Board members, appointed by the state's last two Republican governors, put Ritz, a Democrat, under the microscope Tuesday.

"I think the reason for this meeting is to figure out how this happened and how we can help get the Department of Education back on track," said Gordon Hendry, a Democrat appointed to the board by Gov. Mike Pence. "Clearly there are issues within the department that need to be addressed. This isn't a blame game, but we do need to resolve the issues. And we want to be clear that we're disappointed that we found about this the way we did."

Board members said Tuesday they were angry they did not find out about the concerns with the waiver until the report was delivered last month. But Ritz and her staff said they delivered updates to the board from last fall through this year.

The tense, hours-long meeting recalled some of the board's recent battles centered on the power struggle between Ritz and Pence.

The state has until June 30 to submit an amended waiver to the U.S. Department of Education. Ritz has said she is confident the waiver will be maintained.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!