Indiana forms coalition to fight public corruption

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana is forming a coalition that will take aim at public corruption by training and educating government officials, and drafting legislation intended to protect taxpayer money from malfeasance, the state's attorney general said Tuesday.

Attorney General Greg Zoeller said the new Public Integrity Coalition that's still being put together will be led primarily by groups such as the Indiana Association of Cities and Towns that represent local government officials.

Zoeller will also be a member, along with representatives of the State Board of Accounts — the state agency that audits government bodies when misappropriation of funds are suspected — and other state and federal officials.

One of the coalition's first goals will be training and educating public officials from counties, cities, towns, townships and other local government bodies on the best management practices for handling public money to reduce the amount of taxpayer money that's pilfered by corrupt public employees, Zoeller said.

"We may as well start with a bold mission, one that everyone can agree on — that we're going to try to reduce the access to funds and the misuse of it through greater training and protections," Zoeller said at a news conference at the Indiana Government Center.

Since Zoeller took office in January 2009, his office has sought to collect more than $11 million in public money that had been misappropriated.

Former state deputy auditor Doris Anne Sadler is coordinating the new coalition's outreach effort as it works to solidify its membership. She said the group expects to have its first meeting in June.

The vast majority of government officials and employees are honest, but "the few that stray" give the public an unfavorable view of government, said Matt Greller, executive director of the Indiana Association of Cities and Towns, which represents 569 cities and town.

Cal Bellamy, president of the Shared Ethics Advisory Commission — an all-volunteer group covering Lake, Porter and LaPorte counties in northwestern Indiana — said the group works to prevent public corruption through education and training.

"If nothing else we're removing the excuse that 'No one ever told me that it was wrong,'" Bellamy said.

Indiana State Examiner Paul Joyce said that training in the best management practices for public money is mandatory for some county assessors across the state, but not for all of Indiana's elected or appointed public officials.

Zoeller said the coalition will make recommendations on regulatory changes and legislation that could boost efforts to combat public corruption. He said those could presumably include a push to make such training mandatory, but it's premature to say what the group will decide to pursue.

He said that one of the most common forms of public corruption involves officials who in essence write themselves checks from their office's checking account — a malfeasance made easier in cases where the same person writes a check, cashes it and then accounts for those funds.

He said his office has encouraged officials to require two signatures on each check as best practice for avoiding theft of public funds.is Anne Sadler is coordinating the coalition's formation. She said the coalition expects to have its first meeting in June.


  • Are Big Fish Swimming Away?
    Lets see, the little guy gets slammed for getting caught with his hand in the pickle jar while big fish, like Eric Turner, are found innocent while they pocket millions at taxpayers' expense. Both situations should be reported and punished but justice does seem to be blinded by power and money.
  • Bob makes a great point
    The State has put a lot of resources towards criminally charging these small town money managers for their simple incompetency (they didn't properly handle the receipt or due dates, but hey, that's the quality of people you get in these elections for that amount of pay), but at the same time they fail to investigate the agencies in the State government, or in direct contracts with it, regarding any serious and very large dollar corruption. Don't expect any charges against Murdock for every mistake he has made.
  • All I can say is
  • Public Corruption Running Wild
    The Indiana Inspector General also has a statewide conference on ethics. Doesn't matter because no one enforces the law or gets punished for even the most obvious & worse offenses. Just look at David Lott Hardy

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Aaron is my fav!

    2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

    3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

    4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

    5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...