IBJNews

Indiana House approves statewide smoking-ban bill

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indiana House voted Thursday night to approve a statewide smoking ban bill, setting up a vote Friday in the state Senate on whether the restrictions will be on their way to becoming law.

The House voted 60-33 in favor of the bill, despite opposition from health advocates who argue the proposal is too weak because it includes an exemption for bars and taverns.

Senate supporters of the bill were uncertain whether they had the votes to win passage for Indiana's first statewide smoking restrictions.

Democratic Rep. Charlie Brown of Gary, a sponsor of the bill, asked House members to send "a strong message" to the Senate in support of the measure, despite his reluctance to go along with the exemption for bars.

The Indiana Campaign for Smokefree Air and the American Cancer Society asked lawmakers to reject the bill.

"The Legislature is making it impossible for health advocates and the general public to support a measure that has so many exemptions in it," said Amanda Estridge, a cancer society lobbyist.

The House earlier in the session approved a ban on smoking in most public places and businesses that gave an 18-month exemption to bars, while the Senate passed a watered-down version last week that gave bars a complete exemption.

The compromise version negotiated this week also exempts casinos, private clubs, tobacco stores and some in-home businesses, while it eliminates a Senate-approved provision prohibiting cities and counties from adopting tougher local restrictions.

Republican Rep. Eric Turner of Cicero, another sponsor of the bill, disagreed with health advocates on whether the bill should move forward.

"I think it does accomplish something and it does go a long way to making our state smoke free," Turner told the House.

Gov. Mitch Daniels has said he would sign a smoking ban bill into law.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • smoking ban is bad`
    What till the government takes more of your
    rights away. If you don't like the smoke, find another job. REMEMBER, right to work state!! Hope your boss doesn't make everyones life misserable becouse he wants to smoke. His place, his rules.
  • Nice!
    An intelligent post that invokes propositional logic. Very nice!
  • Sad times for Indiana
    It's a sad day for Indiana when this crap gets signed into law. Remember when this used to be a free country? Remember when we had property rights? Freedom of association?...no more, not in this state, nor many other of the states in this supposedly "free" country.

    The saddest thing is that there seems to be no place to go to escape this kind of tyranny anymore. The whole world is ruled by totolitarian governments.

    Well, at least they exempted bars, but for how long?
  • no smoking
    I hope it's not to late cause I have serious sinus problems from working in a business that allows smoking. Can't tell everybody how happy it makes me that this law was passed.
    • What's left?
      It would appear this bill seems to cover one group: K-12 students @ school.

      Groups who have chosen to go elsewhere because Indiana doesn't have a comprehensive smoking ban can save a lot of time & money by making a preliminary call: "Do you have a smoking ban?"

      "Sort of".
    • superkalifragilisticexpialidocious
      Even though the sound of it is atrocious, the state will be your nanny now and keep you safe and warm. We the state are no different than the current president, got to be everything for everyone. A spoon for of sugar helps these nanny laws go down in the most delightfull way. Sho be good!
    • What?
      Absurd is a great way to describe your post.
      The comparison makes no sense.

      The smoking in bars only effects the adults who decide to patronise or work in them.

      Your comparison effects people in their homes and the choice to move????

      Geez, absurd comparison. Try again.
    • Less regulation! More poisons!
      Hey, I'm thinking of pouring various leather tanning chemicals onto my land and the river that flows through my property. If you don't like it, you have the freedom to move to another watershed. Sorry you and your kids drank that water and got cancer, but this is my property, and you can't take away my freedoms!
      • Perfect
        As a free market pro-freedom, pro-property rights person I think this is the absolute extent to which the Property Rights Reduction bill (also known as the Smoking Ban)should go. I can sort of justify situations in which parents make bad decisions for their kids and bring them into smoky filled rooms etc. However Any venue (such as bars) made up of all individual adults making individual decisions, whether to work there or drink there, should be exempt from any ban.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

      2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

      3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

      4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

      5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

      ADVERTISEMENT