Indiana, Illinois sign deal to build Illiana toll road

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana and Illinois have signed an agreement to build the Illiana Expressway toll road, with Indiana paying $80 million to $110 million, Illinois agreeing to pay at least $250 million, and the rest of the $1.51 billion for the project coming from private investors.

The 33-page document outlines the responsibilities of each state and how the 47-mile highway will be run. The agreement specifically states the road between Interstate 65 near Lowell in northwest Indiana and I-55 near Wilmington, Illinois, 60 miles south of Chicago, will be reserved for vehicles using electronic toll devices with no option for those wanting to pay cash. The road will be a four-lane highway that could later be expanded to six lanes.

The deal, signed last month but not posted online until Tuesday, also specifies that each state is responsible for the design, financing, construction and operations of the highway in their state, with Illinois being responsible for the bridge at the state line. The agreement calls for the two states to have contracts for design, construction and operation and maintenance of the road by early 2015, and to use their "best efforts" to have the road completed by the end of 2018.

Illinois Transportation Secretary Ann Schneider issued a statement saying the deal will help the economies of both states.

"This agreement solidifies that partnership and our commitment to the success of this project," she said. "Moving forward with our regional and local partners, we are not just building a road, but creating jobs, promoting economic development and improving mobility throughout the region."

Critics argue that the road won't have much of an effect on economic development and that it will harm the environment. Andrew Armstrong, a staff attorney with the Environmental Law & Policy Center that has filed two lawsuits trying to stop the highway, said the agreement highlights the financial risks to both states.

"This is a time of really uncertain funding levels at the state and federal level for transportation and there's no need to build this project using very precious taxpayers funds when it's going to be used by so few vehicles in comparison to the existing roads that need maintenance and upkeep," he said.

INDOT spokesman Will Wingfield said the plan calls for private investors to pay the costs the states don't pay and then to receive annual payments through the toll collections. Officials have said it could take up to 18 years for the tolls to start generating a profit. The agreement says Illinois will take 39 years to pay its share of the costs, while it will take Indiana 35 years to pay off its share.

The agreement estimates the cost of the highway to nearly $1.51 billion and says that figure could be changed after the environmental impact study is completed. Officials with the two states had earlier placed the estimated cost at $1.3 billion.

The states are still awaiting federal approval of the project.


  • Good question PAC!
    Awesom question PAC! I had not thought of that. Could not find anything online. My guess is that it would indeed be a spur and thus have an odd first digit of either I-65 or --55. There already is an I-355 along the Western Suburbs of Chicago, so maybe they could just continue that #, onto this road. There was talk of connecting 355 with this new road. I prefer I-357, given that the road does intersect I-57 and Chicao is known for its handgns. :)
  • Oops!
    Gosh darn it! I must have missed this item on the ballot. I need to pay more attention to referendums on transportation spending.
  • "Needed"
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
  • Illiana Expressway is needed
    The Toll Road is needed for truck and other transport and for those who do not want to go past or through/near downtown Chicago and want to bypass the mess at Interstate 80/94 and all points North toward downtown Chicago.
  • What will the road be named?
    Surely they aren't just going to call this the "Illiana Expressway" are they? I would think it will have some interstate designation, or am I wrong on that too? Maybe a spur of I-55 or I-65? Anyone know?

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

    2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

    3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

    4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

    5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.