We're
sorry, but we cannot find the page you requested. Our Advanced Search page can assist in helping you find the article or content you are attempting
to locate.
Thank You!
PAGE NOT FOUND
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Sponsored by
IBJ Featured Advertisers
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Alone. Or with cheese.
MC Mike, I see my error was in thinking that this was about the project in any way. I seems you just have a problem with low-income people. Projects like these helped to lower the rate of homelessness in veterans by 12% just between 2010 and 2011. You paint with a very broad brush...
While I am usually all for shiny new things, the new airport was not needed and a huge waste of taxpayer money. Everytime I drive past the old airport on my way to the new one it angers me! Less convenient & more expensive is never a good combination.
Any news on new tennants at the Fashion Mall after the renovation / addition is finished?
Thanks for answering my question, "Professional": Clearly, you are being intentionally obtuse. Alleged "higher quality" construction vs. lower quality construction isn't the concern of these posters. Whether the quality of the buildings are classified as exceptional or not, with low-income tenants/non-owners, the quality will quickly evaporate. The original Keystone Towers are a good example - when built, the Towers were considered quite modern, efficient and attractive. That situation changed rapidly upon the arrival of Section 8 folk.