PAGE NOT FOUND


We're sorry, but we cannot find the page you requested. Our Advanced Search page can assist in helping you find the article or content you are attempting to locate.

Thank You!

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
 
Subscribe to IBJ

  1. Doc, a few important errors in your statements:

    (1) The developer is spending the CITY'S money (the city is paying for the cost of the garage), so the city can damn well insist on a quality design.

    (2) The LAW requires the proposed building to comply with design standards, and insisting that people follow the law is not giving anyone the "run-around."

    (3) A two-week delay to make some minimal aesthetic improvements is hardly a great imposition being imposed on the developer.

    (4) If the developer would rather build a crappy building elsewhere with their own money, then they are welcome to pick up and do so.

    (4) Indianapolis is a major city, not some podunk town that needs to spread its legs for any developer that throws the place a sideways glance. Indianapolis should insist on the best, not settle for junk. Accepting anything is not going to make Indianapolis grow any faster (not sure where you got that silly notion from), nor is Indianapolis a slow-growth city compared to similarly sized city's in the Midwest.

  2. Alone. Or with cheese.

  3. MC Mike, I see my error was in thinking that this was about the project in any way. I seems you just have a problem with low-income people. Projects like these helped to lower the rate of homelessness in veterans by 12% just between 2010 and 2011. You paint with a very broad brush...

  4. While I am usually all for shiny new things, the new airport was not needed and a huge waste of taxpayer money. Everytime I drive past the old airport on my way to the new one it angers me! Less convenient & more expensive is never a good combination.

  5. Any news on new tennants at the Fashion Mall after the renovation / addition is finished?

ADVERTISEMENT