IBJNews

Indiana Senate panel weighs preschool pilot program

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Public and private school advocates displayed rare unity Wednesday in support of preschool for Indiana children but split over an effort to give children school vouchers once they complete preschool.

An effort led by House Republicans to spend $7 million on a pilot program that would pay for 1,000 students to attend preschool has won broad bipartisan support. But lobbyists representing public school teachers, local school boards and school superintendents rang an alarm bell Wednesday about a provision that would allow those children greater access to school vouchers.

"This is a gateway to vouchers; it's something our association does not support," Frank Bush, director of the Indiana School Boards Association, told the Senate Education and Career Development Committee on Wednesday.

The measure touches on one hot-button of the school voucher debate: Should a child spend a year in public school before qualifying for a voucher, as state law now requires? Voucher supporters have tried hard to eliminate that wait time, and the preschool program would create at least one workaround by allowing preschoolers to qualify immediately for school vouchers.

House Education Chairman Rep. Bob Behning, R-Indianapolis, defended his proposal Wednesday, saying it is more limited than it was being portrayed.

Behning has led an effort in recent months to put more Indiana children through preschool. He says he was surprised by how infrequently children in low-income families are read to before being enrolled in kindergarten.

Though plans to provide more early childhood education have won broad support, more questions have cropped up since the measure passed the House 93-6 last month.

Senate Appropriations Chairman Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, said he was concerned that running a pilot program for 1,000 students could create pressure to put every qualified child in preschool, which could cost between $200 million and $500 million a year.

"The other issue, in all honesty, has to be funding. And if this is good for a few kids, a thousand kids, it's probably good for a lot of kids," he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Woefully
    Charles- You need to spend more time reading the evidence for the benefits of early childhood education and less time in the libertarian chat rooms. Post your tripe at indystar.com.
  • Waste
    The state and federal governmentshould not be funding education . Part of our problem is that education keeps pushing for more funding and less accountability. If we held education to doing the best they could withy the dollars they get, we might have better education. Instead, we add programs and money and do not demand accountability.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    2. If you only knew....

    3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

    5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

    ADVERTISEMENT