IBJNews

Indianapolis still in hunt to be World Cup host

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indianapolis was selected as one of 18 host cities to be included in the United State's application to host the World Cup soccer tournament in 2018 or 2022, the Indiana Sports Corp. announced Tuesday afternoon.

The USA Bid Committee this week pared the list down from 27 sites to 18. Soccer sources say FIFA, the world governing body of soccer, is putting an emphasis on holding the event in newer venues, which is playing in Indianapolis’ favor. Lucas Oil Stadium, which was opened less than 17 months ago, would be the local host site.

If the United States is successful in its bid for the 2018 or 2022 FIFA World Cup, the list of 18 cities would be trimmed to about 12 sites in the years leading up to the event.

ISC and other local organizers will continue to work with the USA Bid Committee on the U.S. bid package that will be put forth to FIFA in May. The host countries for the 2018 and 2022 events will be voted on in December.

There are a handful of other countries bidding for the 2018 and 2022 events, including England, Netherlands-Belgium, Russia, Spain-Portugal, Australia and Japan. The  competition will be fierce for the U.S. going forward, said ISC spokesman John Dedman.

The selection process started with more than 40 possible U.S. venues. The last time the U.S. hosted the World Cup was 1994, and the closest host city at that time was Chicago.

The 1994 World Cup brought in a record 3.6 million fans from around the globe. The average per-game crowd was 69,000. The economic impact for the entire tournament is in the hundreds of millions. But there aren't many studies on what each round would net the host cities.

Indianapolis, if it is fortunate enough to be chosen, would most likely host a preliminary pool-play round. Preliminary pool play involves four teams playing over a week-long period.

Most sports economists agree that even a preliminary round of the World Cup could carry an economic impact near that of an NCAA Men's Final Four basketball tourney. Studies show that direct visitor spending for a men's Final Four is between $45 million and $50 million.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT