INDOT executive Woodruff gets OK to negotiate for job

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

State ethics officials approved a procedure Thursday that is meant to prevent conflicts of interest as a top Indiana Department of Transportation official continues employment talks with an engineering firm whose contracts he’s played a role in reviewing.

But the chairman of the Indiana State Ethics Commission said that the conflict-of-interest questions could become more difficult if INDOT Chief of Staff Troy Woodruff actually takes a job with RQAW Consulting Engineers & Architects.

At Thursday’s meeting, the commission only discussed the screening process that will be used as Woodruff seeks the job. Members did not debate any potential post-state employment restrictions for Woodruff.

Ethics Commission Chairman James Clevenger said he expects the latter will lead “to serious issues.”

State rules require state employees to wait one year before taking a job with a state contractor – if the employee was involved in the negotiations or awards. Woodruff has signed contracts between the state and RQAW. However, INDOT Commissioner Karl Browning could waive the cooling-off period.

“At this point, I don’t think I would deem it OK for post-employment,” Clevenger said. “I’m just telling you that the next step is going to be difficult for me.”

But, Cyndi Carrasco, executive director of the state ethics commission, said the chairman could not entertain the post-employment debate because that was not currently on the table for discussion.

Instead the commission approved the screening procedure INDOT put in place when Woodruff began job negotiations with RQAW on June 23. The procedure is meant to prevent Woodruff – the agency’s chief of staff – from any state business involving the company.

“We understand that there is absolutely a conflict of interest and possible post-employment restrictions, so as soon as (Woodruff) was aware of this potential employment opportunities all of the firewalls were put into place,” said Heather Kennedy, ethics officer for the state transportation agency. “INDOT is fully aware that Mr. Woodruff has been in communication and contact up until the time that the negotiations started.”

The procedure states that Woodruff will not attend the agency’s selection review committee meetings – where contracts are reviewed – until his negotiations are completed and a decision is made about potential employment with the company. Also, Deputy Commissioner Jim Stark will sign all consultant contracts for state-funded programs until the negotiations with RQAW have finished.

An investigation by The Indianapolis Star found that two weeks after Woodruff’s job negotiation with RQAW began, INDOT awarded the company with a project worth $175,000 to $350,000 even though it did not receive the best score from the staff. Woodruff – usually a member of the selection committee – did not attend that meeting.

But, the investigation found that Woodruff had personally signed at least three other contracts with RQAW – worth $562,000. And the selection committee awarded the company a contract for a roadwork job in Jasper County – for $294,300 – even though Lawson-Fisher Associates received the highest score from department staff.

Browning has not decided whether to waive the cooling-off period for Woodruff, said INDOT spokesman Will Wingfield.

Woodruff called his potential departure from the state bittersweet.

“I really enjoyed my time with the state government but it’s time for a new challenge in my life,” he said.

Woodruff deferred additional questions to INDOT’s spokesman.

“The chairman voiced his opinion, and we respect his opinion,” Wingfield said. “Obviously, if there was going to be another request put in, they would evaluate the request at that time. All members of the commission would vote on that request.

“There are other aspects beyond just one opinion on something that hasn’t been submitted yet,” he said.


  • Its the Culture
    The "business as usual" conflict of interest culture in Indiana government is rampant. We need some leadership at the top of state government and at the top of agencies to change both the "appearance" and existence of conflicts of interest. Indiana politicians and Commissions talk a good game but do nothing. They like to focus on technical issues of the law rather than on clear moral issues. Disgusting!
  • Many Issues
    1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.
  • GIve me a Break!!
    Am I the only citizen that thinks this is too incredible to be believed? How could he not be benefitting from this connection? There are good people that work for state government but it's idiots like this that cast doubt on the honesty of all the other employees of state agencies. Where is the integrity of the people who are in a position to do something about this? So disgusted.....
  • Corruption
  • wow
    My lord, the corruption in this city and state is rampant and widespread. We put Chicago to shame.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So much for Eric Holder's conversation about race. If white people have got something to say, they get sued over it. Bottom line: white people have un-freer speech than others as a consequence of the misnamed "Civil rights laws."

  2. I agree, having seen three shows, that I was less than wowed. Disappointing!!

  3. Start drilling, start fracking, and start using our own energy. Other states have enriched their citizens and nearly elminated unemployment by using these resources that are on private land. If you are against the 'low prices' of discount stores, the best way to allow shoppers more choice is to empower them with better earnings. NOT through manipulated gov mandated min wage hikes, but better jobs and higher competitive pay. This would be direct result of using our own energy resources, yet Obama knows that Americans who arent dependent of gov welfare are much less likely to vote Dem, so he looks for ways to ensure America's decline and keep its citizens dependent of gov.

  4. Say It Loud, I'm Black and Ashamed: It's too bad that with certain "black" entertainment events, it seems violence and thuggery follows and the collateral damage that it leaves behinds continues to be a strain on the city in terms of people getting hurt, killed or becoming victims of crimes and/or stretching city resources. I remember shopping in the Meadows area years ago until violence and crime ended make most of the business pack you and leave as did with Lafayette Square and Washington Square. Over the past 10 to 12 years, I remember going to the Indiana Black Expo Soul Picnic in Washington Park. Violence, gang fights and homicides ended that. My great grandmother still bears the scares on her leg from when she was trampled by a group of thugs running from gun fire from a rival gang. With hundreds of police offices downtown still multiple shootings, people getting shot downtown during Black Expo. A number of people getting shots or murdered at black clubs around the city like Club Six on the west side, The Industry downtown, Jamal Tinsley's shot out in front of the Conrad, multiple fights and shootings at the skating rinks, shootings at Circle Center Mall and shooting and robberies and car jackings at Lafayette Mall. Shootings and gang violence and the State Fair. I can go on and on and on. Now Broad Ripple. (Shaking head side to side) Say It Loud, I'm Black and I'm Ashamed.

  5. Ballard Administration. Too funny. This is the least fiscally responsive administration I have ever seen. One thing this article failed to mention, is that the Hoosier State line delivers rail cars to the Amtrak Beech Grove maintenance facility for refurbishment. That's an economic development issue. And the jobs there are high-paying. That alone is worth the City's investment.