IBJNews

UPDATE: Interactive falls after results miss expectations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Interactive Intelligence Group Inc. shares fell more than 19 percent Monday night and Tuesday morning after the company reported an unexpected loss in the first quarter, missing analyst predictions.

The Indianapolis-based software company on Monday afternoon reported a loss $2.6 million, or 12 cents per share, in the latest quarter. It marked the company's first quarterly loss since the third quarter of 2012. Interactive earned $1.5 million, or 7 cents per share, in the same quarter a year ago.

Company shares dropped sharply in after-market trading Monday and continued to sink Tuesday. The stock traded at $50.35 shortly after noon, down $11.75, or 18.9 percent from Monday's closing price.

The adjusted loss for the quarter was $400,000, or 2 cents per share, compared to adjusted earnings of $3.6 million or 17 cents per share, a year ago.

Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expected adjusted earnings of 1 cent per share.

Revenue for the quarter, which ended March 31, rose more than 8 percent, to $79.4 million. Analysts expected revenue of $79.67 million.

Management blamed the loss on the company’s ongoing shift to cloud-based software.

"As we increasingly shift to a higher proportion of cloud-based orders and have more revenue deferred to future quarters, our reported short-term profitability is affected," CEO Don Brown said in a prepared statement issued Monday after markets closed. "But we look beyond this and remain committed to making investments that drive the growth of our business, particularly with our cloud-based offerings targeting the highest growth segment of our market."

Deferred and unbilled revenue increased 56 percent, to $321 million, up from $206 million a year ago.

Cloud-based orders for the Interactive’s software, which helps manage corporate contact centers, increased 165 percent, to 59 percent of total orders.

Cloud orders also increased in size, to an average of $935,000 each, up from $788,000 a year earlier.

The shift to the cloud began lowering Interactive’s profit in 2012.

The change meant a shift in the company’s fundamental sales model. Previously, the company set up call centers on-site for customers and collected fees. Using the cloud means collecting subscriptions from customers, which causes revenue to come in much more gradually.

The company needs to hire and expand operations in order to keep up with demand, Brown and Chief Financial Officer Stephen Head said during a conference call with investors and analysts.

Monday’s earnings release came four days after Interactive made a major hiring announcement for Indianapolis.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Why not take some time to do some research before traveling to that Indiana town or city, and find the ones that are no smoking either inside, or have a patio? People like yourself are just being selfish, and unnecessarily trying to take away all indoor venues that smokers can enjoy themselves at. Last time I checked, it is still a free country, and businesses do respond to market pressure and will ban smoking, if there's enough demand by customers for it(i.e. Linebacker Lounge in South Bend, and Rack and Helen's in New Haven, IN, outside of Fort Wayne). Indiana law already unnecessarily forced restaurants with a bar area to be no smoking, so why not support those restaurants that were forced to ban smoking against their will? Also, I'm always surprised at the number of bars that chose to ban smoking on their own, in non-ban parts of Indiana I'll sometimes travel into. Whiting, IN(just southeast of Chicago) has at least a few bars that went no smoking on their own accord, and despite no selfish government ban forcing those bars to make that move against their will! I'd much rather have a balance of both smoking and non-smoking bars, rather than a complete bar smoking ban that'll only force more bars to close their doors. And besides IMO, there are much worser things to worry about, than cigarette smoke inside a bar. If you feel a bar is too smoky, then simply walk out and take your business to a different bar!

  2. As other states are realizing the harm in jailing offenders of marijuana...Indiana steps backwards into the script of Reefer Madness. Well...you guys voted for your Gov...up to you to vote him out. Signed, Citizen of Florida...the next state to have medical marijuana.

  3. It's empowering for this niche community to know that they have an advocate on their side in case things go awry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrst9VXVKfE

  4. Apparently the settlement over Angie's List "bundling" charges hasn't stopped the practice! My membership is up for renewal, and I'm on my third email trying to get a "basic" membership rather than the "bundled" version they're trying to charge me for. Frustrating!!

  5. Well....as a vendor to both of these builders I guess I have the right to comment. Davis closed his doors with integrity.He paid me every penny he owed me. Estridge,STILL owes me thousands and thousands of dollars. The last few years of my life have been spent working 2 jobs, paying off the suppliers I used to work on Estridge jobs and just struggling to survive. Shame on you Paul...and shame on you IBJ! Maybe you should have contacted the hundreds of vendors that Paul stiffed. I'm sure your "rises from the ashes" spin on reporting would have contained true stories of real people who have struggled to find work and pay of their debts (something that Paul didn't even attempt to do).

ADVERTISEMENT