IBJNews

IPS among four districts receiving F grades from state

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis Public Schools was one of four school districts statewide that earned an F grade last year, according to data released Wednesday by the State Board of Education and the Indiana Department of Education.

The A-F grades are calculated based the percentage of students passing the state standardized tests, the growth in scores students showed versus their peers statewide, and various other factors. State leaders are now in the midst of rewriting the grading system.

School-level grades for the 2012-13 school year were released by the state in December.

IPS received 0.96 points, on a 4-point scale, based on its students’ performance in the 2012-13 school year—just shy of the full point needed to earn a D grade. IPS’s score was greatly improved from the previous year, when it earned just 0.24 points on the 4-point scale.

Districts must score 2 points to earn a C, 3 points to earn a B and 3.5 points to earn an A.

Out of 289 districts statewide, 94 districts, or 33 percent, earned an A; 82 districts, or 28 percent, earned a B; 91 districts, or 31 percent, earned a C; 18 districts, or 6 percent, earned a D; and four districts, or 1 percent, earned Fs.

Besides IPS, the other districts earnings Fs were Medora Community School Corp. in southern Indiana, Gary Community Schools Corp., and the School City of East Chicago.

Those same four districts also earned Fs during the previous school year. Two districts improved from an F the previous year to a D in the most recent school year: Kokomo School Corp. and the School City of Hammond.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • More Focus on Schools is Required
    We need more focus on public school reform, and less focus on bike paths, electric cars, and getting the Super Bowl again. I have nothing against those initiatives, as they bring in substantial short term money into our city, but until there is a fundamental change in the quality of education for our cities youth, there will be no change in quality of life holistically for our city. People will continue to move north to better public schools until we radically shift our focus and improve our schools. Charter schools, public/private, waiver systems... there is no wrong answer at this point, because clearly what we are doing RIGHT NOW is failing. Our students are failing, and as a result our city will remain a second-tier destination. If we want to become a world class city, we have to start at the bottom, and improve public schools.
  • Dangerous Minds
    Let's compare indy to a third world country. Education helps wih bringing down crime and providing opportunities for those that are less fortunate. We desperately need to focus on the children of the future. If they see that there is a future, then guns, gangs, drugs will not be a direction they look foward to. Forget faith and 10 point just focus on education brining back to community. The gangs will extinguish themselves once they kill each other off.
  • Flight to Burbs
    And this is exactly why people move to the Carmel, Fishers, and Zionsvilles. If IPS could turn around, we could have a really successful city. I mean, Indianapolis is is the bottom 1% of the entire state!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT