Tracks fight for spot on IRL slate

July 14, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
There will be a flurry of off-track activity in the next two weeks as the Indy Racing League finalizes its 2009 schedule. Series officials are expected to sit down with several track operators in the next few days to discuss their future with the IRL.

The IRL is trying to incorporate some of the former Champ Car’s most promising markets along with a handful of potential new markets while trying to determine which of its current venues it should retain. The 2009 schedule is expected to have 18 or 19 races.

“We’re not going to please everyone, so at the end of the day we do have to make a decision we’re charged with making, and that’s balancing all considerations and making the best call for our business,” said Terry Angstadt, president of the IRL’s commercial division.

Nashville, where the IRL raced last weekend, could be on the outside looking in. Team officials complained that the track is not conducive to good racing, and spectators complained that there was far too little passing and side-by-side racing. IRL officials were upset by what they perceived as a lack of promotion by track and city officials for the event.

But Nashville does have some things going for it. It has hosted an IRL race going back to 2001 and it is the headquarter for the series’ tire manufacturer, Firestone.

Firestone routinely brings 2,000 to 4,000 people out for the race weekend for corporate entertaining. The tire company also helps promote the event. Officials for Nashville Superspeedway said they intend to fight to keep the event on the IRL calendar.

As part of the reunification earlier this year, Long Beach, Calif., Edmonton and Surfers Paradise in Australia were added to the mix. Another race in Toronto appears very likely to be on the 2009 schedule.

The merger also has produced interest from track owners from Mexico to Oregon and New Hampshire. Las Vegas is also said to be another strong candidate to host an IRL race in 2009. Miami, meanwhile, appears to be another current IRL market that will likely be cut from the 2009 schedule, league sources said.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • IRL officials were upset by what they perceived as a lack of promotion by track and city officials for the event.

    Ahh, there was no promotion. I went to the race and saw one billboard.
  • Personally, I'm hoping Road America will be on the schedule for 2009. It's definitely one of the best places to go to a race and its been a Champ Car venue since the split. The drivers love it and the fans love it.

    Also, Australia is apparently not a sure thing for this year. It's now missing from the posted schedule on indycar.com and I've heard that Australia made some absolutely unreasonable demands on the IRL that they aren't willing to do (in other words, this one isn't TG's fault).
  • This is funny. The earl cancer destroying more venues, Australia in serious jeopardy even for this year, and they are seriously considering New Hampshire and Vegas? Hysterical.

    They should continue their cheap imitation of CART/Champ Car and schedule Korea and China along with Australia. Heh.

    Putting those scheissewaagens on Road America would be a total abomination (not to mention another attendance failure). They've already made a joke of the Indy 500, why make it worse by ruining a great venue like RA? (Don't answer, that's rhetorical)

    The ideal schedule for the 'league' would be as follows:








    Nice. I like it. FTG should pay me to fix his mess.
  • Gee, Stan, so bitter. And when good things come to pass, you'll still be on the wrong side of the road.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT