Now that Rick Greenspan has announced his resignation, it’s time to start speculating on who the
next Indiana University athletic director will be. As a news reporter, I try hard not to interject my opinion. But to start
this conversation, I’d like to throw out what I think is one obvious candidate. John Laskowski.
I know a lot of people have called for an IU guy to be installed as basketball and/or football coach or any number of other positions, and I’ve never subscribed to that school of thought. We all saw how well that worked out with football coach Cam Cameron. But if there’s a position within the school’s athletic department that calls for an IU guy, it’s that of athletic director. Here’s why.
A very smart man who was once a three-term mayor of a mid-sized south central Indiana city once told me that the main job of the mayor is to get the garbage picked up weekly and the streets cleared of snow in the winter. Essentially, he said, it’s a public relations job. You put good lieutenants in the right positions to handle much of the day-to-day work, he concluded.
The same could be said about the athletic director. Lately at IU, the trash hasn’t been picked up, and it’s starting to stink--even all the way up here in Indianapolis. The AD position is about opening lines of communication, building consensus and raising funds. Greenspan was obviously not the right candidate for any of that. His idea of open communications was waiting for the media to file public access requests, which seems to be happening in Bloomington on a regular basis these days.
I know there are those who will argue that he is not qualified to manage an athletic department with a nearly $50 million budget, but I think Laskowski is almost tailor-made for the AD job. As a guard on the 1975 Bob Knight-led IU basketball team, he has the connections to mend the fences torn down under Greenspan and his predecessor, Mike McNeely. I think he would instill some sorely needed discipline into the program. He has shown solid judgment during his time at IU and since his graduation. He has a Hoosier sensibility that has been sorely missing in Bloomington for eight years. Lastly, I think he respects Knight, but I don’t think he’s a crony, and he’d probably do the job for a lot less than McNeely or Greenspan commanded.
Most importantly, Laskowski may be one of the few guys who actually wants the job. He did in 2000, when McNeely was hired away from the San Diego Chargers. Here’s why Laskowski said he was qualified for the job in 2000.
“No. 1, I’m a fan of Indiana. No. 2, I’m a graduate. And No. 3, I’m a guy who's been around here 30 years,” Laskowski said. “If I were selected, it would be a transition that I'm already used to doing, working here at the university.”
I’m sure Laskowski’s logic seemed a little too simple for IU trustees who have a habit out of turning four-function mathematics into quantum physics. In addition to playing hoops for IU, Laskowski, 55, also spent more than 25 years doing broadcast work for IU basketball telecasts. Laskowski also served as vice president of marketing and membership for IU’s Alumni Association. He’s even been known to be a regular at local weekly Kiwanis meetings. In 2005, Laskowski took a job with Marsh Inc., a division of Chicago-based Seabury & Smith, a company that sells insurance and financial services to alumni associations. But he still maintains a local presence.
If you think Laskowski merely has men’s basketball on his mind, think again. Eight years ago, he said some of his top goals included increasing attendance at football games and improving promotion of secondary sports--especially women’s sports at IU.
I know nationwide--even worldwide--searches for job candidates are all the rage these days. Those types of searches have netted IU the likes of Adam Herbert, McNeely and Greenspan. I just hope an obvious candidate in IU’s own backyard doesn’t get overlooked-again. I’ve told you what I think. Please, tell me what you think.








IBJ Conversations
14 Comments
Add Comment
He's a Stanford / Notre Dame Law guy, so not Cream & Crimson, but a lawyer who gets sports and can clean up the program might be a good direction.
That, coupled with a guy who understands the past, lives in the present, and has great vision for the future might be a good fit down in B-Town.
Just my opinion, I could be wrong.
Case closed. Knows the school, loves the school, is a likable and respected figure, has the smarts and is PR ready, speaks well, a nice combo of characteristics for an AD.
Never even crossed my mind, but sometimes the most obvious/simple choice is the best.
I emailed the trustees my coaching list as they began their search for a new coach. Not saying I have ANY clout at all, but ironically 2 names that were high on my list of 8-10 coaches were: Tony Bennett and Tom Crean, umm, let's just say both came into play.
Articles like this one sometimes make it to the Trustees and by getting the word out early, you'd be surprised how the tail can wag the dog and shake up the search from the ground up (because when the top 'execs' make decisions behind closed doors without input, we all know it might not turn out well).
Well done, great idea... JOHN LASKOWSKI HAS MY VOTE!
An AD surrounds himself with people that handle the many of the details. He directs much of the activities, but also acts as a liason between IU Athletics and the Fanbase. Joe Emptysuit or Richard Nobodylikes might not resonate with fans, donors, coaches, his staff, players, etc... It would also be nice if IU had a really good business school to possibly get a solid mind to run the business side of things... oh it does? Nice, even better. And AD is a figure head. Needs to know the numbers and business operations, but also needs to have the rest of the package (something Greenspan did not have). If handled right and surrounded by the right people, it could work out well. So no... he wasn't kidding you.
demonstrated?
Here is another quote of his just a couple of weeks into the AD job at Butler about the coaches and staff he said - “I just want them to know that we intend to be a championship-seeking athletic department in everything that we do. We do not want that to go unsaid. It sets the bar. Goals are good, but you have to have the work to go with that. Our staff is already doing that. I am just here behind them.”
Two things he has over Laz is he has coached for 30 years and he has experience now as an AD.
It may be that as much as he loves Butler he might not want to leave but then there is the step up in both money and prestige.
1) he is so tied to knight that is will cause a distraction. think not...notice how as a sportscaster he referred to knight as COACH, and when talking with davis or sampson he called them by MIKE and KELVIN. obvious bias in newscasting that is very unprofessional.
2) he is and was the worst sportscaster, and despite the fact he has kept that job, it clearly is an indication that likely lacks qualifications as athletic director.
3) he lobbied for the job the last time, and rightfully wasn't selected.
ties to IU are wonderful. but the one selected must be an independent thinker.