Is Hall Render marooned at No. 2?

June 18, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
If a high rank brings bragging rights and marketing juice, then the Indianapolis law firm of Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman (permission granted to catch your breath) has plenty of ammo.

But it never quite gets the most ammo.

Hall Render was named second-largest health care law firm in the nation by the American Health Lawyers Association this week.

The professional group has placed Hall Render second or third for several years running â?? but never No. 1.

Thatâ??s because the Atlanta colossus King & Spalding is much bigger. This year it had 199 members to Hall Renderâ??s 124.

Still, Hall Render manages to keep its spot by out-growing other firms. In 2005, it managed a No. 2 rank with only 62 members.

A high placing is good for the ego, but are these rankings actually important? Is there a significant difference between No. 1 and 2 when it comes to landing business?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Current clients certainly don't care, and potential clients most likely won't know nor will they even care if Hall Render is #1 or #2 on some highly subjective list. Such lists have little to no value, and sometimes are the result of how some administrative person filled out a particular form. And, big is not always better. If I was a prospective health care client, I would want to know if I will be able to get the close, personalized attention I need with a firm that seems to be infatuated with size. I am more concerned with service. If the results are good, the service is good and the fees are competitive, I could care less how many lawyers are with the firm.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT