Is Thompson right on jobs?

March 6, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Earlier this week, Jill Long Thompson, who is running for the Democratic nomination for governor, said Gov. Mitch Danielsâ?? approach to economic development has focused on individual companies to the detriment of big-picture policy changes that could improve the business environment.

In addition to writing economic development incentives into the tax code, she said she would award incentives based at least partly on whether companies offer health care, add technology, improve productivity and cut environmental impact.

Companies also should be allowed to buy health insurance through pools, and individuals should be given permanent tax deductions to help finance their health care and ongoing education, she said.

And Thompson called for a renewed emphasis on vocational training in high school.

What do you think?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Once again, we have a politician that wants to define the way in which businesses focus and what their priorities should be. If I'm the CEO of a company looking at Indiana, I tell Ms. Thompson to stick it and I go somewhere else.

    It's not necessarily wrong that the state should have input into how the state invests its employer partnership dollars, it's just the definition that Ms. Thompson would make - likely wrong headed in every direction.

    She needs to stick to polishing her nails.
  • I agree, I am a Dem, and I am not particularly fond of Thompson. Hear approach of writing tax incentives for Economid Development into the State Constituion is WHACK. Great lets spend 4 legislative sessions trying to get it writen in code since it has to go through 2 different legislative assemblies to change anything to the constitution. Meanwhile - the whole paradigm shift of Economic Development will occurr and then we wil spend 2 more legislative session tryuing to get it out of the constitutional code.

    I'm not saying there aren't some broader policies that could be implemented, but I think as we go one business or oe industry at a time is better then lets help all at once. groups are going to be left out, feel they have been purposly singled out, get upset and then leave.

    Of course, I'm not sure schellinger is the answer either. If thompson wins the primary - here comes a vote for Daniels. If schellinger wins the primary - I might still vote for Daniels it will just have to depend on what Schellinger does.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT