ISO drops popular park concerts

March 6, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Turning over the blog for this item to reporters Kathleen McLaughlin and Scott Olson:

The Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra is bowing out of the free summer concert series at Garfield and Holliday parks.

Symphony CEO Simon Crookall said he decided last fall, after the city of Indianapolis reduced its arts funding by $500,000, or one-third, that the summer concerts would have to go.

“Unfortunately, you cut the things that aren’t producing any revenue,” Crookall said. He estimated that one outdoor concert with a rehearsal costs $60,000. “For this year we have ruled them out, but for the future, they’re very important concerts,” Crookall said. “We will look to reinstate them somehow.”

IndyParks officials recently learned of the change and said they will try to fill the ISO’s slot with other classical or jazz groups.The professional orchestra concerts have drawn big crowds in the past. Last year each of the ISO concerts, held on weeknights in July, drew at least 2,000 people, Art Services Manager Paul Norman said. The long-running concerts have drawn crowds as large as 4,000 in past years, he said.

The professional orchestra will continue to perform at Ellenberger Park on the east side because that concert series is sponsored by Community Health Network. The ISO will appear on July 21 at 7:30 p.m.

Arts managers don’t know yet exactly how much money they will lose because of the city’s budget cuts. The city money supports grants from the Arts Council of Indianapolis, which announces its awards in May. After the city cut its arts budget, Crookall said the ISO figured that would mean $50,000 to $80,000 less in the 2009 Arts Council grant.Last year, the ISO received $251,000 from the Arts Council. Crookall said the money was not earmarked for specific programs, but instead went into the general fund. While the grant application is for general support, Crookall said it is justified by the symphony’s free concerts and other outreach.

There might be even less taxpayer support for outreach next year. The Arts Council stands to lose $130,000, or 13 percent of its $1 million grant from the Capital Improvement Board. (The CIB uses food and beverage, hotel and other consumption taxes to support sports venues.)

The debt-burdened CIB’s finance committee this week recommended a $442,000, or 13 percent, cut in grant funding.The CIB would trim its local tourism grant by $260,000; a grant to the Central Indiana Corporate Partnership by $32,500; and another to the Indiana Black Expo by $19,500. -- Kathleen McLaughlin and Scott Olson
  • it just go's to show where the ceo's head is at. if he would have asked the musicians im sure they would have volunteered for that event. as musicians we master our instruments for the delight of others, not for how much we are going to be paid. to see people love and appreciate the music you are creating is payment enough for most. the symphony at garfield park was the only place where some would ever have seen a concert featuring iso. i guess the ceo would rather they pay instead.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.