IBJNews

ISTEP+ gains come amid increasing accountability

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana students made improvements across the board on the state's standardized test this year amid a push for more school accountability and the first state takeovers of failing schools.

Scores released Tuesday show 71 percent of the 500,000 students tested in grades three through eight passed both the language arts and math sections of the ISTEP+ exam, an improvement of 1 percentage point from last year and 8 percentage points from the 2008-09 school year. The passing rate for the math portion rose 2 percentage points to 81 percent, while 79 percent passed the language arts section, up 1 percentage point from a year ago. Students also showed improvements on the science and social studies exams.

This is the first time that more than 80 percent of students tested demonstrated proficiency on at least one of the four subjects tested, Department of Education officials said.

State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett said a "standing ovation" was in order for the improvements, which come as Indiana has toughened its school accountability measures. The state Board of Education voted last year for the first time to take over schools because of poor performance on the tests. Three high schools and a middle school in Indianapolis and a high school in Gary were turned over to private operators.

"I'm going to characterize today as a day of congratulations, a day of thanks and a day of challenge," Bennett said to applause from teachers, principals and a handful of students gathered in his Statehouse office. "For the third consecutive year, our state has seen an increase in student performance on our ISTEP tests."

Dickinson Fine Arts Academy in South Bend showed the most improvement of any middle school in the state. The school was placed on probation for four years and faced possible state takeover if it remained at that level for six consecutive years.

Bennett said Dickinson's performance on both the language and math ISTEP+ sections — the school improved its combined passing rate from 32.9 percent in 2011 to a 59.2 percent this year — was enough to remove it from the state's probation list.

Principal Tom Sims said the key to pulling up his school's scores was telling parents the gravity of what they faced in a state takeover of the school and helping them get more involved with their children. Improving that passing rate also required adding Saturday classes and pulling some students out of classes to place them in math and English language remediation courses, he said.

"What we did in one year, I think any urban school district can do," Sims said.

However, critics including Indiana State Teacher's Association President Nate Schnellenberger say those approaches have created a "teaching to the test" strategy that deprives students of a broad education.

"We should be developing well-rounded citizens who have at least some idea that life is more than math and science and English," Schnellenberger said. "I just think there are so many kids whose interest in school is in one of the areas that are being cut."

Indiana's school takeover law predates Bennett by almost a decade, but he has worked since then to reduce the time before a takeover can occur from six consecutive years of probation to four and expand the candidates for takeovers to include schools that score a D on their annual performance.

Bennett said people tend to resist change but contended staying the same can be more painful.

"We're human beings and we kind of like to stay the same," he said. "Accountability is not all punitive."

While the threat of a state takeover may force some schools to action, it's not a concern for most schools and districts that face little chance of ever being taken over, said Wayne Barker, superintendent of the Bluffton-Harrison Metropolitan School District in northeast Indiana.

Bluffton-Harrison MSD posted one of the state's best gains over the past year, improving its passing rate on both math and English tests by 6.9 percent. Barker took over as superintendent three years ago. He said the district has analyzed Department of Education data to see where students aren't testing well and adjusted the curriculum to fill the gaps.

"I really feel like our people are doing a great job at really diving into the data to understand where students are and what they need," Barker said. "I was hopeful we would see the results to back that up, and we did."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT