IU AD search: Who's on first?

October 22, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
iuflagWhere Indiana University is with its search for a new athletic director is anyone’s guess. IU officials are better—much better—at misdirection plays than its beleaguered football team.

Yesterday, IU spokesman Larry MacIntyre told the Indianapolis Star that university President Michael McRobbie has not seen a list of candidates to replace outgoing AD Rick Greenspan. But Monday, MacIntyre told the Indiana Daily Student the short list had been narrowed to at most five people. So does that mean there’s a short list? There isn’t a short list? There’s a short list that McRobbie hasn’t seen and maybe isn’t aware of, but MacIntyre is aware of?

MacIntyre is the same spin doctor that said earlier this month that the very large IU search committee had hired a search firm to help find a new AD. But a day later, he recanted that. Apparently they had talked to, but not hired a search committee. Huh?

IU has taken a vow of silence when it comes to Oregon State AD Bob De Carolis being a candidate. Meanwhile, The Oregonian is reporting today that OSU basketball coach Craig Robinson said that De Carolis told him last week that he would be interviewed for the IU job.

There’s one thing for sure, kind of. McRobbie, according to MacIntyre’s latest proclamation, is in no hurry to replace Greenspan. Apparently, IU’s leader is about the only one not in a hurry to put this chapter of IU athletics in the rearview mirror.

“President McRobbie will take however much time he needs to make a well-informed decision,” MacIntyre said.

Well informed—wouldn’t we all like to be afforded that luxury?
  • There may be confusion in the press office, but I hope there's no confusion in the president's office when it comes to making the selection -- pick an athletic director from Indiana ... someone who knows the difference between Doc Counselman and Dr. Wells. Managing an athletic department is not rocket science. Find a Hoosier with good judgement, management skills, and an understanding of the intersection of sports and business, and we’ll have a great new AD. We certainly couldn’t do worse than the “professional ADs” we’ve brought in recently.
  • There seems to be no shortage of confusion coming out of Bloomington these days. One looking for an IU Hoosier with good judgement, managements and the intersection of sports and business might find that commodity is in short supply. It's not rocket science, but the current powers sure make it look that way.
  • Davis,

    For starters, that Tom Crean nod appears to be nearly genius. Michael McRobbie, by all accounts, is a very solid president well respected by the trustees and faculty. People bashed the search committee that turned out 2 very capable candidates and ultimately landed Tom Crean and a boatload of optimism taboot.

    People called for Greenspan's head after the controversial Failure To Monitor and IU showed him the door despite massive donations, facilities, and overall successes he's seen across all sports. IU reacted to both the Sampson and Greenspan fallout in good faith. Keep in mind McRobbie had nothing to do with Sampson or Greenspan's hiring... nothing.

    Because IU isn't opening their AD process like an open book, meaning you have NO IDEA what is going on behind the scenes doesn't mean this process is being botched by any means.

    Bob De Carolis was the main name to surface recently and reported here as well. A solid name with Big Ten ties, huge donor ability, and a business-like AD style that has pumped life into Oregon State's athletics (see: 2 upsets over USC and back to back Nat'l College World Series titles for evidence, plus new facilities, and massive fan support).

    Where is the confusion? Because you are confused doesn't mean there is confusion in Bloomington. They've laid out a pretty straight forward process. Greenspan will be out in December and they've narrowed down a small group of candidates that they will act upon shortly. Confusion??? Sounds fine to me so far. IU would be foolish to be open about talking about ADs who are still employed.... further, I think that is actually unethical and probably against a code of conduct to publically discuss currently employed ADs.

    Confusion OR just the process itself??? I'll stick with the latter.
  • Looks like we might have found a good guy, fro Indiana this time.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. A couple of issues need some clarification especially since my name was on the list. I am not sure how this information was obtained and from where. For me, the amount was incorrect to begin with and the money does not come to me personally. I am guessing that the names listed are the Principal Investigators (individual responsible for the conduct of the trail) for the different pharmaceutical trials and not the entity which receives the checks. In my case, I participate in Phase II and Phase III trials which are required for new drug development. Your article should differentiate the amount of money received for consulting, for speaking fees, and for conduct of a clinical trial for new drug development. The lumping of all of these categories may give the reader a false impression of physicians just trying to get rich. The Sunshine Law may help to differentiate these categories in the future. The public should be aware that the Clinical Trial Industry could be a real economic driver for Indiana since these revenues supports jobs and new job creation. Nationally, this account for 10-20 billion which our State is missing out on to a large degree. Yes, new drug and technology development has gotten most of the attention (e.g. CTSI, BioCrossroads, etc.) However, serious money is being left on the table by not participating in the clinical trials to get those new drugs and medical devices on the market!!!! I guess that this is not sexy enough for academia.

  2. The address given for the Goldfish Swim Club is the Ace Hardware, is it closing?

  3. Out of state management and ownership. If Kite controlled it, everything would be leased. Of course, due to the roundabout, there is limited access to the south side of 116th now also. Just have to go down to the light.

  4. Hey smudge, You're opposed to arresting people for minor crimes? Sounds great! We should only focus on murders and such, right? Let's stand around and wait until someone shoots someone before we act. Whatever we do, we should never question anyone, frisk anyone, or arrest anyone unless they are actively engaged in shooting or stabbing. Very sound!

  5. You guys are being really rude to gays in the comments. (Not all of you, I presume). You need to stop it. Gays have just as much of a right to marry as straight people do. It's not fair how you guys are denying them equal rights. They're acting more human than you'll ever be. We obviously haven't matured since the bible was last updated. Hate the sin, not the sinner. You've all committed a sin at least once in your life. You've lied, you've stolen, etc. (Those are just possibilities). We should have a planet for people that support gay rights and a planet for people that don't. Then, gay people could get married without you bigots interfering with their love life. How would you feel if straights couldn't get married? How would you feel if teenagers were afraid to come out to their parents as straight? If straight people got hate everywhere they went? If straight people were afraid to go out in public, because they feared being judged? It's never going to happen at the rate society is going. You haven't seen the side of me where I act obscene. You're glad my inner demon hasn't been released. I would, but oh no, my comment would be removed because of my very strong emotions about this subject. I love gays, and love how they show their affection for each other. I just ADORE how a state is going to give same-sex couples a marriage license, then changes their mind. (I was obviously being sarcastic there). I just LOVE how society thinks gays are an abomination to our society. You're caring about marriage between two men or two women. That's a small thing. Just grow up, and let them marry. Let them live their lives. You can't make them change their sexuality. You can't make them change their lifestyle. In my opinion, gays are more than welcome to marry. Please, grow up and realize that people should be allowed to marry, even if it's same-sex marriage. You guys are saying that "the bible said gay marriage is wrong." Well, guess what else is wrong? Read Matthew:7 and you'll find out. (I am in no way breaking that. I am saying a fact). I'm stating that gays have just as much of a right to marry as straights do. (: