IU AD search: Who's on first?

October 22, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
iuflagWhere Indiana University is with its search for a new athletic director is anyone’s guess. IU officials are better—much better—at misdirection plays than its beleaguered football team.

Yesterday, IU spokesman Larry MacIntyre told the Indianapolis Star that university President Michael McRobbie has not seen a list of candidates to replace outgoing AD Rick Greenspan. But Monday, MacIntyre told the Indiana Daily Student the short list had been narrowed to at most five people. So does that mean there’s a short list? There isn’t a short list? There’s a short list that McRobbie hasn’t seen and maybe isn’t aware of, but MacIntyre is aware of?

MacIntyre is the same spin doctor that said earlier this month that the very large IU search committee had hired a search firm to help find a new AD. But a day later, he recanted that. Apparently they had talked to, but not hired a search committee. Huh?

IU has taken a vow of silence when it comes to Oregon State AD Bob De Carolis being a candidate. Meanwhile, The Oregonian is reporting today that OSU basketball coach Craig Robinson said that De Carolis told him last week that he would be interviewed for the IU job.

There’s one thing for sure, kind of. McRobbie, according to MacIntyre’s latest proclamation, is in no hurry to replace Greenspan. Apparently, IU’s leader is about the only one not in a hurry to put this chapter of IU athletics in the rearview mirror.

“President McRobbie will take however much time he needs to make a well-informed decision,” MacIntyre said.

Well informed—wouldn’t we all like to be afforded that luxury?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • There may be confusion in the press office, but I hope there's no confusion in the president's office when it comes to making the selection -- pick an athletic director from Indiana ... someone who knows the difference between Doc Counselman and Dr. Wells. Managing an athletic department is not rocket science. Find a Hoosier with good judgement, management skills, and an understanding of the intersection of sports and business, and we’ll have a great new AD. We certainly couldn’t do worse than the “professional ADs” we’ve brought in recently.
  • There seems to be no shortage of confusion coming out of Bloomington these days. One looking for an IU Hoosier with good judgement, managements and the intersection of sports and business might find that commodity is in short supply. It's not rocket science, but the current powers sure make it look that way.
  • Davis,

    For starters, that Tom Crean nod appears to be nearly genius. Michael McRobbie, by all accounts, is a very solid president well respected by the trustees and faculty. People bashed the search committee that turned out 2 very capable candidates and ultimately landed Tom Crean and a boatload of optimism taboot.

    People called for Greenspan's head after the controversial Failure To Monitor and IU showed him the door despite massive donations, facilities, and overall successes he's seen across all sports. IU reacted to both the Sampson and Greenspan fallout in good faith. Keep in mind McRobbie had nothing to do with Sampson or Greenspan's hiring... nothing.

    Because IU isn't opening their AD process like an open book, meaning you have NO IDEA what is going on behind the scenes doesn't mean this process is being botched by any means.

    Bob De Carolis was the main name to surface recently and reported here as well. A solid name with Big Ten ties, huge donor ability, and a business-like AD style that has pumped life into Oregon State's athletics (see: 2 upsets over USC and back to back Nat'l College World Series titles for evidence, plus new facilities, and massive fan support).

    Where is the confusion? Because you are confused doesn't mean there is confusion in Bloomington. They've laid out a pretty straight forward process. Greenspan will be out in December and they've narrowed down a small group of candidates that they will act upon shortly. Confusion??? Sounds fine to me so far. IU would be foolish to be open about talking about ADs who are still employed.... further, I think that is actually unethical and probably against a code of conduct to publically discuss currently employed ADs.

    Confusion OR just the process itself??? I'll stick with the latter.
  • Looks like we might have found a good guy, fro Indiana this time.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT