IU fights battles on two fronts

June 16, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
iufballstadiumIt’s difficult to say which challenge will be more daunting for Indiana University’s athletic department—the king-size sinkhole in the school’s football field or the self-inflicted wound to the image of its men’s basketball program.

It will cost between $750,000 to $1 million to fix the football field. The tab will be much more if the artificial playing surface is a total loss. And IU officials aren’t sure the repairs can be made in time for the Aug. 30 season opener. 

If Memorial Stadium can’t be fixed in time for next season, that will lead to greater losses in ticket and other ancillary revenue that comes with each home game. IU has eight home football games set for 2008.

There’s no word on where the games will be played if Memorial Stadium can’t be fixed. A likely alternative is to move them to the opponent’s field. There’s also no word on where the money will come from to fix the problem.

The damages caused by recent storms and flooding in Bloomington come at a time when IU is ramping up its ticket-sales efforts. It also comes at a time when the school’s football program is making significant contributions to the overall athletic department and non revenue-generating sports.

Last year, for the first time in many years, IU’s football team outscored the university’s storied basketball program in revenue generation. The school’s football revenue grew from $10.5 million in 2005 to $17 million in 2007. The men’s basketball team revenue rose from $11.9 million to $12.3 million during that same period.

The football team accounted for almost 40 percent of the $44.7 million that IU’s athletic department generated during 2007, up from only 28 percent in 2005. Both programs keep the IU athletic department’s head above water.

So which is a more pressing challenge: the basketball program’s public relations nightmare or the football stadium’s fall into a money pit?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Can the August 30th game be moved to the Luke? I would love to attend an IU game there.
  • Bloomington South High School maybe?
  • The football team is going to relying on Lewis returning to the team this year, and yes it will hurt, but as bigjer said first, move the game to Lucas Oil. This will get a game in Indy, and probably sell more tickets anyways.
  • I think the football situation is more dire. I feel that way because of the unknowns. Indiana basketball has bottomed out by cleaning house and hiring Tom Crean. Almost every analyst sees the IU basketball program in good hands to rebuild and return to prominence. IU football on the other hand is more shakey. The field is really just a complication that will have a predictable outcome, because one way or another the field will eventually be fixed. The direction of the football team in not certain. Is Lynch the long term answer? Is Lewis the quarterback? Can they replace Hardy? Can they make 2 bowls in a row?
  • IU could play at Franklin Central's megafield.
  • Good one Joyce. I'm laughing, but in some ways it's not really funny. The facility is definitely big enough to handle an IU game.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT