IBJNews

IU Health readies bond sale

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana University Health plans to sell $228.2 million in bonds this week to finance its Saxony hospital in Fishers and to refinance existing debt.

The Indianapolis-based hospital system disclosed the bond sale in an April 13 document distributed to bond investors.

The actual date and terms of the sale have yet to be set.

IU Health plans to use $70 million of the proceeds to pay for the building and equipment at Saxony Medical Center, a 40-bed facility in Fishers. IU Health expects the hospital to open at the end of this year.

Part of the bond proceeds will go to pay down  financing IU Health has been using to fund Saxony construction so far, which began in 2008. In November 2009, IU Health—then called Clarian Health—executed a sale-leaseback deal with The Herrick Co., a real estate investment firm with offices in Florida and New Jersey.

The Saxony hospital will offer cardiology, orthopedic services and neurosurgery, as well as an emergency room and a 100,000-square-foot medical office building.

Nearly all the remainder of the money—or $157.5 million—will go to refinance or restructure bonds sold in 2008.

IU Health also will spend $740,000 to issue the bonds via the Indiana Finance Authority. Indianapolis-based Ice Miller LLP is IU Health’s bond counsel. And Indianapolis-based Baker & Daniels LLP is representing the firms underwriting the bonds: Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Citi and US Bancorp.

According to Fitch Ratings, IU Health also is planning a second bond sale in early May, of $166.1 million, which will refinance bonds sold in 2003 and 2005.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT