IU nets $21 million from Adidas deal

April 30, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IUsoccerIndiana University today signed an eight-year deal with Adidas that will net the school’s athletic department $21 million in cash and products over the course of the agreement.

Portland, Ore.-based Adidas will supply footwear and apparel for all 24 of the university’s sport programs as part of the pact. The deal includes uniforms, training apparel and sideline gear and accessories for athletes and coaches.

The new agreement extends Indiana’s partnership with Adidas, which has been the official footwear and apparel supplier for the Hoosier since the 2004-05 academic year.
The new contract begins with the upcoming 2008-09 academic year and extends through the 2015-16 seasons.

Adidas supplanted Nike as IU's shoe and apparel provider after an open bidding process in the spring of 2004. A Nike deal was ushered in while Mike Davis was basketball coach in 2001, but Adidas, which had a previous relationship with IU, came back to school officials to sweeten the offer in late 2003. This time, school officials said, Adidas' offer couldn't be beat.

“We appreciate [Adidas’] willingness to provide our student-athletes and coaches with the best products to aid their development and training, as well as their financial assistance to our department,” Indiana Athletics Director Rick Greenspan said.

The Hoosiers are one of three Big 10 schools that have a similar Adidas deal. The other two are Michigan and Wisconsin. Other Adidas schools include Notre Dame, UCLA, Tennessee, Nebraska and Kansas.

In addition, Adidas has marketing agreements with the National Football League, National Basketball Association and Major League Soccer.
  • You mean Michigan State, not Michigan, right?
  • While several of Michigan State's sports teams are outfitted by Adidas, the school does not have an agreement with the company that spans across all sports. In the Big 10, only IU, Michigan and Wisconsin has that kind of deal. By the way, Michigan's 8-year deal signed in 2007 is worth $60 million to the school in cash and products.
  • Obviously IU's deal pales in comparison to Michigan's; do you have any information on how it stacks up against other Big Ten and/or Indiana schools? Also, do you have any information about the range or average figure for all D-I schools?

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...