Upsets hurt Big Ten tourney revenue

March 19, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
tourneylogoAs a result of quarterfinal losses by Indiana and Purdue, attendance for last week’s men’s Big Ten basketball tournament at Conseco Fieldhouse fell below projections. After Session 3 (the one featuring IU and Purdue) drew a single-session record 18,691, the semifinal session drew 17,525 and the championship drew 14,579. The five-session total was 80,012. That’s short of the 90,763 the tournament drew in Indianapolis in 2006.

With face value of tickets ranging from $35 to $85 for the semifinal and final, the early upsets of IU and Purdue likely cost event organizers close to $300,000 in ticket revenue alone. Add in parking, concession and other ancillary sales that would have been driven by larger crowds, and the loss of potential income likely hit $400,000.

The early losses of IU and Purdue might also have been a factor in the tournament’s TV ratings. The championship game on Sunday earned a 1.5 rating for Wisconsin's win over Illinois, a 52-percent drop from the Ohio State-Wisconsin title game last year, according to New York-based Nielsen Media Research. One rating point equals about 1 million households nationally.

One factor in the decline is that the Southeastern Conference title game was moved from 1 p.m. on CBS to 3:30 p.m. on ESPN2, possibly cannibalizing viewership. Also, interest in Ohio State All-American Greg Oden, who played in the 2007 Big Ten championship game, played a role in driving ratings up last year, according to media analysts.

College hoops fans that watched any of this year’s Big Ten basketball tournament, live or on television, probably noticed the colorful logo that adorned center court at Conseco Fieldhouse. Indianapolis ad firm Bradley and Montgomery, which is known for its work with MTV and Microsoft, signed a deal last year to create the logo that will be used through 2012 in conjunction with the tournament.

BAM Principal Scott Montgomery said the agency created the logos for free as a service to the city and the Big Ten, but he didn’t deny that such high-profile projects add to the firm’s reputation. BAM used the two primary colors of all 11 Big Ten teams in the design. The 22 pennants used in the design were woven together to look like a top-down view of a swooshing net. The marks were used throughout the Fieldhouse and along streets outside the facility. “Anything we can do to make this city look more attractive, we want to do,” Montgomery said. “We want to be good community members, but it also helps us with our [employee] recruiting.”
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Loss money? You have to have it first before you can loose it. Is the Big Ten finally admitting that their efforts at doing their own broadcasts instead of allowing local TV markets to run their games has netted a net loss from when they did allow this? At any rate, all I can say is you reap what you sow.
  • No, he is not discussing Big Ten Network. He is refering to the attendance at Conseco for the games and the ratings on the final game (which was broadcast on CBS and NOT on BTN)

    Read a little more carefully next time before you rant
  • You can't plan the finances of a sporting event on the outcome. Surely the Indiana Sports Corp. knows this. Or do they?
  • The final game just wasn't interesting. Illinois made a good run, but they can't shoot free throws to save their lives. There was no way they were going to beat Wisconsin and everyone knew it. Wisconsin was already a shoo-in for the tourney and Illinois didn't have a good enough record to even make the NIT. Who the heck wanted to watch that game? The Illini fans are fair-weather at best. They stopped watching their team halfway through the season. Badgers didn't need to watch the game because the game simply didn't matter. It was bad luck for the conference, but it just didn't end up being a game that made a difference.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT