IUPUI apologizes to janitor

July 14, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
How did we get to the point where someone can be accused of racial harassment for reading a scholarly book about the Ku Klux Klan â?? a book in which the good guys, Notre Dame students, whip the bad guys, the Klan?

Thatâ??s what happened at IUPUI in a flare-up that both the university and the accused say came to a close late last week.

Janitor Keith John Sampson was told by IUPUI last year that he had insulted black co-workers and all but carried pornography to work by reading â??Notre Dame vs. the Klan: How the Fighting Irish Defeated the Ku Klux Klanâ?? during a break â?? a book, coincidentally, carried in the university library.

After civil rights groups, including the ACLU, pressured IUPUI, the university began to backpedal and finally â?? after being shamed by a Wall Street Journal columnist earlier last week â?? sent a letter of apology to Sampson.

What do you think?
  • I think he should sue IUPUI and the insulted co-workers for the emotional distress of having to work with such idiots.
  • Typical ivory tower attitude. All for free speach unless it's not the speech they like.
  • I didn't know about this. How crazy? I've read that book and there is absolutely nothing in it that would/should cause offense with anyone. It sounds like the person(s) who logged this complaint with the University had a personal agenda that they were taking out against this person. If it wasn't that, then it must have been a bitter person who was just looking to try and stir trouble somewhere.

    Shows how sad today's society is. Pretty bad when you have to tread lightly when reading a non-fictional, history book. Seems like people are making up reasons to be offended today as they want the attention and want the world to revolve around them and to feel sorry for them. I think that just waking up in the morning must hurt the feelings of the person who brought up this complaint!! The world is so against me! How will I ever survive! Boo-who for you! Get over it and focus on things that actually matter and quit worrying about who's going to hurt your feelings today.
  • Jason, of course you know the person(s) that complained didn't bopther to actually read the book. It was enough to see the cover which had white-hooded guys (or maybe a burning cross?) with the ND golden dome in the background. Obviously, if someone put up a poster of burning crosses or nooses or whatever, that woudl be wrong and insulting, if not illegal. And it's understadnable that the people that saw the cover might be offended initially, but to hell with asking the janitor what he's reading or saying, Hey, that's offensive to me! and then letting him defend the book.

    Furthrmore, and this is bigger problem, is that the University did what it did even after learning the facts!
  • Indy Guy,

    I couldn't agree more, and it's made me ashamed of Indiana University. Though it obviously won't make a difference to the institution, I decided against renewing my Alumni Association membership and, for the first year since they've been offered, I didn't get Indiana University license plates (with the requisite donation to the IUAA).

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.