February 2, 2013
J.K. WallFrustrated by up-and-down state funding for startup life sciences companies, industry leaders are talking up a plan to create
a dedicated funding stream that could total $30 million a year.
More
January 21, 2012
Kathleen McLaughlinRepublican State Sen. Brent Waltz has filed a bill that would require the Indiana Economic Development Corp. and businesses
seeking awards from the 21st Century fund to match the state’s money with outside capital at a four-to-one ratio.
More
March 3, 2011
Elevate Ventures could attract an additional $30 million in matching federal and private funding to support entrepreneurs
statewide, Indiana Economic Development Corp. officials say.
More
February 12, 2011
Chris O'MalleyEven as some of its investments bear fruit in grand fashion, the state’s principal fund for investing in high-tech companies
may get even less in the next budget than it did two years ago when its funding was cut in half.
More
January 22, 2011
Chris O'MalleyThe state’s principal fund investing in high-tech companies has reached a milestone—for the first time recouping
all the money it granted an emerging company, and then some.
More
August 10, 2009
IBJ StaffA panel of five leaders of the state’s life sciences
industry took on a wide range of topics
July 24 at IBJ’s Power Breakfast
at the Westin Indianapolis.
More
December 1, 2008
Peter SchnitzlerIndiana legislators are signaling that everyone who receives funding from state government must tighten their belts as tax
collections fall short of projections. That could cause pressure for cuts to key technology incentives.
More
November 26, 2007
Peter SchnitzlerFor a preview of how Indiana's 2008 gubernatorial election will play out, look no further than the emerging tussle over entrepreneur
Scott Jones' $4 million in awards from the state's 21st Century Research & Technology Fund.
More
These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.
The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)
As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.
The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.
I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.