April 25, 2013
IBJ StaffCeladon CEO Paul Will noted that the latest quarter had two fewer business days than the previous year's period and was
hampered by heavy winter storms.
More
March 26, 2013
Jeff NewmanThe Indianapolis-based trucking firm first announced plans for the driver-education center in January, but has since expanded
the project and employment projections while seeking state incentives.
More
March 25, 2013
IBJ StaffIndianapolis-based trucking carrier Celadon Group Inc. and the state are set to make an announcement Tuesday morning "regarding
hundreds of new jobs." A source familiar with the deal said the announcement involves a previously announced driver education
center.
More
January 24, 2013
The Indianapolis-based trucking company said profit increased to $7.4 million in the fourth quarter due to higher freight
revenue and lower operating expenses.
More
January 19, 2013
Chris O'MalleyNew Celadon Group CEO Paul Will wants to increase productivity at the trucking firm, not just through more sophisticated customer-relationship
and tracking software, but also by improving the acumen of the company’s nearly 4,000 employees.
More
January 16, 2013
The Indianapolis-based trucking carrier plans to build a $5.25 million driver-training center and add 182 jobs as part of
its latest expansion at its east-side corporate campus.
More
January 4, 2013
Chris O'MalleyThe Indianapolis-based company's Celadon Trucking Services subsidiary has agreed to acquire Warren-based Rock Leasing
Inc. in northeast Indiana and Wadley, Ala.-based Kelly Logistics Inc.
More
January 2, 2013
Chris O'MalleyIndianapolis-based trucking carrier Celadon Group Inc. plans to build a $5.25 million driver-training center and add 182 workers
to its 633-employee local work force by 2016.
More
October 24, 2012
Indianapolis-based trucking company Celadon Group said fiscal first-quarter profit rose to $8.3 million due to higher freight
revenue and lower operating expenses.
More
October 13, 2012
IBJ StaffIndianapolis-based Celadon Group Inc. is a trucking company that provides long-haul, full-truckload freight service through
Canada, the United States and Mexico.
More
October 8, 2012
Chris O'MalleyThe Indianapolis trucking company expects its quarterly earnings to beat analysts' consensus forecast and last year's
results, thanks to acquisitions and cost controls. Shares were up 9 percent at 1 p.m.
More
July 30, 2012
IBJ StaffThe Indianapolis-based trucking firm on Monday said earnings rose 63 percent, to $9 million, in the fiscal fourth quarter.
Quarterly revenue rose 4 percent, to $157.5 million.
More
May 24, 2012
Bloomberg NewsA cross-border trucking pact that ended a 17-year trade dispute between the U.S. and Mexico last year may unravel unless more
Mexican big rigs start crossing the border. Failure of the program could have an impact on trucking firms like Indianapolis-based
Celadon Group Inc.
More
April 30, 2012
Associated PressCeladon Group Inc. announced Monday that it has named Eric Meek as executive vice president, chief financial officer and treasurer,
effective immediately, as part of a succession-planning process.
More
April 24, 2012
IBJ StaffCeladon Group Inc. saw higher revenue and profit in its latest fiscal quarter, the Indianapolis-based trucking firm announced
Tuesday night.
More
March 21, 2012
Bloomberg NewsTrucking companies, including Indianapolis-based Celadon Group Inc., are struggling to find qualified drivers even as the
U.S. unemployment rate remains at the highest level in almost 30 years.
More
March 1, 2012
Scott OlsonThe agency claims the Indianapolis trucking firm subjected job applicants to medical exams and failed to hire qualified driving
candidates because of disabilities. Celadon CEO Steve Russell denies wrongdoing.
More
January 25, 2012
IBJ StaffIndianapolis-based trucking firm Celadon Group Inc. earned $5.4 million in its latest quarter compared with $2.9 million in
the same period in 2010.
More
January 4, 2012
The abatements will help the company build a $3.4 million, 36,000-square-foot office building at its far-east-side headquarters.
Celadon also plans to add 100 jobs.
More
December 16, 2011
Scott OlsonCeladon Group Inc. is seeking tax abatements from the city to build a $3.4 million office building at its far-east-side headquarters.
The local trucking firm plans to hire 100 more employees by 2016.
More
October 29, 2011
Chris O'MalleyCeladon Group has swallowed, whole or in part, nine trucking firms in as many years. But the acquisition momentum lurched
to a halt late this month like a semi stopped by a runaway-truck ramp when it was rebuffed by Arkansas-based USA Truck. Since
then, Celadon hasn’t signaled its next move.
More
October 27, 2011
IBJ StaffCeladon Group Inc.’s first-quarter profit grew nearly 23 percent, to $5.4 million, or 24 cents a share, on revenue of
$141.5 million.
More
October 24, 2011
Cory SchoutenUSA Truck Inc. has turned down a meeting with Indianapolis-based trucking rival and investor Celadon Group Inc. to discuss
a possible merger.
More
October 11, 2011
IBJ Staff and Bloomberg NewsIndianapolis-based Celadon has become USA Truck's seventh-largest investor with a $4.7 million purchase of shares. In a regulatory
filing, the truckload carrier reported its interest in combining with its rival.
More
July 28, 2011
IBJ StaffCeladon Group Inc. put together its best fourth fiscal quarter since 2006, with earnings doubling over the same period a year
ago, to $5.5 million.
More
liek the rest of America
These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.
It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.
No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.
whoa!