December 12, 2012
Associated PressGov. Mitch Daniels said Wednesday he has been hearing from companies that fear that a measure that would put Indiana's
ban on same-sex marriage into the state constitution might also prevent firms from offering benefits to gay couples.
More
November 26, 2012
Associated PressSupporters and opponents of gay marriage are already squaring off in a battle over whether to amend Indiana's constitution
that could stretch until voters decide the issue in November 2014.
More
March 29, 2011
Associated PressThe Indiana Senate on Wednesday overwhelmingly OK'd a proposed amendment to the state constitution that would ban gay marriage
and civil unions.
More
February 15, 2011
Associated PressThe Republican-controlled House voted 70-26 to advance the proposal, which must clear two separately-elected Legislatures
to get on the ballot for a public vote.
More
October 31, 2010
Associated PressA recent poll found that more than 60 percent of likely voters support the proposed constitutional amendment, and some of
the measure's biggest opponents have given up the fight.
More
Three Magi
Cats out of the bag. The object of the game is to get acquired. That means the company has no idea how to grow beyond a certain point. Email is a 1990s technology. I have laughed at this company since day one. Such a small bit player. If it was anywhere but here, it wouldn't be newsworthy.
Esther, Indy has passed Chicago in the local government corruption arena. Don't downgrade us. We're No. 1 in the Midwest.
Does the buyer get to keep the recent Accu-Chek J.D. Power award? Be careful, those Swiss cannot be trusted. Last June they pimped Mayor Ballard and former Governor Daniels at a media op, announcing plans to invest "$300 million at its Indianapolis headquarters, creating up to 100 new jobs by 2017," only to turn around and close the Roche Nutley, NJ facility and eliminate 1000 jobs there later the same week. It seems that healthcare can be innovated only as long as money is to be made. Right now Roche seems to have big eyes for China: there are many Chinese in China and potential billions in Swiss francs! Since Roche is having difficulty with US insurance companies swallowing the bill for overpriced cancer drugs (with debatable efficacy) why not sell insurance to the Chinese and market the drugs to them there? There is a name for these sort of business practices however proper decorum precludes it use in this forum.
Same kind of Luddites who oppose I-69. Guessing their 501(c)(4) application probably sailed right through the IRS.